Best Oss Lens For Sony A6400

by -43 views

The Sony a6000 is a legend. Information technology was the camera that made me realize that mirrorless was (is) the futurity.

Although I no longer own the a6000 – I take since upgraded to the Sony a6400 – the a6000 will e’er be one of my favorite cameras.

Sony had initially replaced the a6000 with the Sony a6100, merely, probable due in role to the chip shortages of 2022, Sony has discontinued the a6100. This means that the Sony a6400 will likely be the “spiritual successor” to the a6000 camera – which up until 2020 or so, was even so considered a current model and still sold every bit new in some markets.

Let’s take a look at some of the best Sony lenses for the Sony a6400 and Sony a6100 or any of the a6000 series cameras:

  1. Sony xviii-135mm f/three.5-v.half-dozen OSS
  2. Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 VC
  3. Sony East 35mm f/1.8 OSS
  4. Sigma 30mm f/1.4
  5. Sony 30mm f/3.5 Macro
  6. Sigma 56mm f/1.4
  7. Sony 10-18mm f/four
  8. Sony 18-105mm f/4 OSS
  9. Sigma 16mm f/1.4
  10. Sony 70-350mm f/ii.viii OSS
  11. Sony 20mm f/ii.8
  12. Sony Zeiss 24mm f/ane.8

You can click the links to go straight to the section below pertaining to that lens.

As you lot can run across, just from this list, Sony’s lens line-upward has you covered for most everything you demand. In that location just isn’t any truth anymore to the old belief that Sony ‘forces’ you to buy full frame lenses for their APS-C crop sensor bodies.

Not to mention, there is a lot to like with Sony’southward new strategy with their APS-C mirrorless photographic camera line.

For example, Sony has trickled down their “existent time tracking” auto focus technology across their unabridged APS-C range. Yes, fifty-fifty the ‘lowly’ Sony a6100 gets this feature. As a point of comparison, the popular total frame Sony a7III does NOT have this feature.

Sony’s crop sensor lens line-upwardly has gotten some criticism for not getting as much dearest every bit their full frame line-up. Which is probably off-white.

Maybe they don’t button the envelope as much as their total frame cameras, but, Sony’s APS-C cameras have also come a long way from the days of the a6000, a5100 and Sony a6300.

Once yous consider recent releases like the new zoom lenses from Tamron such as the Tamron 17-70mm f/two.8 and xi-20mm f/2.eight and Sony’s superb seventy-350mm K OSS lens (an incredible value). There simply isn’t a lot of holes in the line-up anymore.

Sure, the prime lens line-up may not be every bit extensive as that of the Fuji X-mount, for example, just it is still expert. As long as you don’t overlook the Sigma trio of f/1.4 prime number lenses (16mm, 30mm, 56mm), you’ll be able to build a killer kit.


  • i
    All-time all-in-one zoom and travel lens for the Sony a6400

    • ane.1
      Sony 18-135mm f/iii.5-5.6 OSS (SEL18135)
  • 2
    Best everyday lens for the Sony a6400 (Zoom lens)

    • 2.1
      Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di Three-A VC RXD (B070)
  • three
    All-time everyday lens for the Sony a6400 (Prime lens)

    • 3.i
      Sony E 35mm f/one.viii OSS (SEL35F18)
  • iv
    Best low light lens for the Sony a6400

    • 4.i
      Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary
  • 5
    Best Macro Lens for the Sony a6400

    • 5.1
      Sony E 30mm f/3.5 Macro lens (SEL30M35)
  • six
    Best portrait lens for the Sony a6400

    • 6.ane
      Sigma 56mm f/1.iv DC DN Contemporary
  • seven
    All-time ultra wide-angle lens and landscape lens for the Sony a6400

    • seven.1
      Sony 10-18mm f/4 OSS (SEL1018)
  • 8
    All-time lens for video for the Sony a6400 (zoom)

    • viii.1
      Sony E PZ xviii-105mm f/four OSS G (SELP18105G)
  • 9
    Best lens for vlogging and video (prime lens)

    • nine.1
      Sigma 16mm f/1.iv DC DN Contemporary
  • 10
    Best telephoto lens for sports and wild fauna

    • 10.i
      Sony 70-350mm f/2.8 M OSS (SEL70350G)
  • xi
    Best pancake lens for the Sony a6400

    • 11.i
      Sony E 20mm f/2.viii (SEL20F28)
  • 12
    Best lens for street photography

    • 12.1
      Sony Zeiss 24mm f/ane.viii  Sonnar T* (SEL2418Z)

All-time all-in-one zoom and travel lens for the Sony a6400

Sony 18-135mm f/iii.5-5.half dozen OSS

aka the Disney world lens.

With a vast 27-202mm equivalent zoom range, this is the best pick if yous’re looking for an all-in-one zoom lens for travel photography.

Sample image from the Sony 18-135mm, best travel lens for the Sony a6400

When this lens was first released, a lot of people were scratching their heads – Sony already had the 18-200mm OSS and the Zeiss xvi-70mm f/4 – was there really a need for this lens?

I have to admit, I was one of those people.

When this was first announced, the full general consensus was that Sony should take focused on rounding out the other gaps in their APS-C line-upwards, instead of developing this lens.

But, that’s all water under the bridge now. Sony has since added more lenses, such as the higher end 16-55mm f/ii.eight and the lxx-350mm One thousand lenses to plug the major gaps in the lineup.

And, it turns out, this lens is quite a performer.

Equally someone who is by and large non a fan of zoom lenses – this lens has been a revelation to me. It’south probably my favorite “all in one” zoom lens, for any system, for whatsoever sensor size.

Information technology has less achieve than the Sony 18-200mm LE (27-300mm-equivalent), but it comes in at a smaller size and substantially lower weight. For a travel and walk-around lens, the size and weight reduction is significant.

In terms of size-weight-operation vs price, the xviii-135mm OSS is ane of the subconscious gems in Sony’s line-up.

It sort of lies nether the radar, because of its unsexy discontinuity range of “merely” f/iii.5-f/5.6. Simply, it’s sharp across the zoom range, even wide-open and has surprisingly great bokeh rendering. All in a lens that tips the scales at just over 300 grams while covering a very useful focal range.

Information technology works cracking as a single travel lens, or as a combo with a fast prime lens (like the Sigma 16mm f/1.four or Sony 35mm f/1.viii OSS) or with an ultra-wide bending lens like the 10-18mm f/4 or the new Tamron 11-20mm f/2.viii, depending on your needs and shooting style.

Compared to the Sony 18-200mm (SEL18200LE) and xviii-105mm f/4 (SELP18105G)

In keeping with its travel friendly specs, this lens is smaller and lighter than the other ultrazooms in Sony’s APS-C lineup, mainly the Sony xviii-200mm and the Sony 18-105mm f/4.

The 18-135mm extends an inch when you zoom out from the widest end all the way to 135mm. Whether stowed in the bag or when shooting, the 18-135mm is smaller than the other two ultra zooms.

On paper, it’s nigh 100 grams lighter than the Sony eighteen-105mm f/iv zoom, simply I tin say that in existent world use, the difference feels much bigger than that.

This lens is significantly easier on the cervix and shoulders, peculiarly when you lot’re walking around all twenty-four hours.

If you’re just trying out lenses in your living room, the difference won’t experience like much, but when you lot’re traveling and walking effectually all day, the eighteen-135mm is definitely the more portable lens.

Here, you can see the lens zoomed all the style to 135mm. As y’all tin can see, butt extension is fairly minimal.

Size of Sony 18-135mm when fully zoomed out to 135mm

Compared to the Sony Zeiss 16-70mm f/4 (SEL1670Z)

The Sony Zeiss 16-70mm f/4 Vario-Tessar is the other all-in-one travel zoom option, but this lens is noticeably less sharp across the same focal range. And quite a bit more expensive, likewise. The Zeiss does of course have the advantage of the constant f/4 aperture and that wider range, only at a price that’s twoscore% more than, I don’t think it’s a good value.

Plus, the 18-135mm has the advantage of OSS congenital into the lens. Peculiarly useful for cameras with no in-torso stabilization, like the a6300 and a6400.

Upgrade from the Kit Lenses

Overall, the 18-135mm lens is a smashing pace-up from the 16-50mm kit lens, and I’d prefer carrying just this lens vs carrying both the 16-50mm and the 55-210mm kit lenses together.

You surrender a fair chip on the telephoto end vs the two kit lenses (because the 55-210mm is an 82.v-315mm-equivalent), but the quality you go is worth information technology. Plus, y’all have the reward of not needing to swap lenses.

The close focus performance of the 18-135mm is also a nice surprise. Information technology can do 1:3.4 reproduction. It’s non a macro lens, only it can exist called upon to do some close-ups of flowers and nutrient.

There is very little to complain about here. The only affair I would have liked to see is some form of weather sealing. Unfortunately, this lens doesn’t even get a rubber gasket on the mountain.

Despite not beingness weather sealed, the advantage of an all-on-one zoom lens is that yous won’t demand to alter lenses in dusty environments

Whatsoever ultra-zoom is a compromise, and Sony fabricated the right compromises with this lens.

It’s not a constant discontinuity zoom, information technology’s not conditions sealed, and it doesn’t comprehend as much range as the 18-200mm OSS, merely it’s small and lightweight, and it is sharp through out the range at a price that won’t break the depository financial institution.

Sony eighteen-135mm aperture at each focal length

  • f/3.5 at 18mm
  • f/4 at 20mm
  • f/iv.five at 32mm
  • f/5.half-dozen at 60mm

As you lot tin see, aperture closes downward quickly. It’due south a tiresome lens, so it’southward not the best for getting creamy bokeh. Merely, bokeh rendering is very pleasing, which helps a lot. Quality of bokeh is a dissimilar thing from quantity of bokeh. Too, when you’re traveling, you want to testify equally much of the surround every bit possible anyway.

And f/ at 85mm or at the maximum 135mm is more than proficient enough for subject area-background separation. With the smooth and not too distracting bokeh rendering, it’s more than than good enough. I’d rate bokeh


as even better than some lenses with brighter apertures.

Highly recommended.

If yous’re willing to spend a bit more, and carry a bit more weight, the Tamron 17-70mm f/ii.8 (run across this lens discussed below) is the side by side step up, albeit with less zoom range.

Sony 18-135mm Main specs:

  • Price: Check the current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 27-202mm
  • Filter thread size: 55mm
  • Size – Length x bore: 3.46″ x ii.65″
  • Weight: 326g
  • Minimum focusing distance: 45cm or 17.7 inches

Best everyday lens for the Sony a6400 (Zoom lens)

Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di 3-A VC RXD

Size of Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 on Sony a6400

The first of its kind. The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.eight is the only APS-C lens covering a versatile broad angle to short telephoto range (four.1x zoom) WHILE featuring a abiding f/2.8 discontinuity.

With a bright discontinuity and a 26-105mm equivalent focal range, this lens can pretty much cover 95% of shooting scenarios.

Dissimilar Tamron’s lenses designed for Sony full frame, this lens also features their fantabulous vibration correction (VC) prototype stabilization technology.

Tamron has made some of the all-time selling lenses for Sony total frame (Atomic number 26) cameras (such every bit the very popular Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8), but as of this date, they’ve avoided calculation vibration correction. Fortunately, they chose to add information technology here, with a minimal increase in size and weight.

This is a large deal, peculiarly for video shooters, since the vibration correction (VC) can help get rid of a lot of the petty jitters when filming.

On-lens epitome stabilization also works better for stills photography vs in-body image stabilization when shooting at longer focal lengths.

In some other bonus for film makers, this lens has practically no focus animate.

Similar the other Tamron lenses with an RXD motor, autofocus is fast and accurate on Sony bodies. This has been Tamron’southward large advantage over other 3rd-political party lens makers – they’ve been able to take full advantage of Sony’s excellent AF organization.

The improver of lens stabilization means an increase in weight, but to counter that, the lens is more often than not high quality plastic, just it is also fully atmospheric condition-sealed. That’southward a trade off that I like.

The constant f/2.8 on a longer zoom range is a game changer. Not merely does it assistance y’all shoot higher shutter speeds for freezing motion, or just to proceed your ISO downward, it likewise helps when shooting at the telephoto end, to get y’all some beautiful background mistiness.

Go along in mind, the 70mm f/2.8 at the long end of this lens is no different from the 70mm f/2.8 of a 24-70mm f/2.7 Pro zoom, except it’s cropped to a 105mm field of view. In other words, your field of view and corporeality of blur is roughly the aforementioned as what you become from the long stop of a 24-105mm f/4 full frame lens.

As yous tin can see in the graph below, the amount of groundwork blur at 70mm f/2.8 on an APS-C sensor, is very like to a 70mm f/ii.8 full frame lens and a 105mm f/4 full frame lens.

Background blur and bokeh comparison of 70mm f/2.8 vs 105mm f/4

The Tamron 17-70mm vs the Sony 18-135mm + a bright prime lens?

This is a tricky question – it requires that you be articulate on what you want. Do y’all want the practise information technology all lens? Or do you desire to carry another lens?

Because of its longer zoom range and constant aperture, the Tamron is a great all-in-one solution. Plus, it’s conditions sealed, the Sony xviii-135mm is not.

Only, information technology’southward as well larger and heavier. Information technology’due south actually bulkier than the full frame Tamron 28-75mm f/two.8 and but fifty grams lighter than that lens.

The Sony 18-135mm is cheaper and smaller, and covers a longer zoom range. But, y’all’ll typically want to pair it with a brilliant prime equally well.

Depending on your shooting style, and whether you like irresolute lenses or not, this could exist an advantage or disadvantage.

For me, personally, I love shooting with an 18-135mm + Sigma 16mm f/one.four OR Sigma 30mm f/1.4 combo. It covers a great range, and the f/1.four prime will accept me covered in ultra low light, much better than the Tamron can.

Now, having the eighteen-135mm and a prime number lens is actually heavier in the bag than having the Tamron 17-70mm alone. Just this is a compromise I’m willing to make.

An f/1.four prime number offers a full two stop advantage vs the f/2.8 on the Tamron, which can be significant in depression light.

Another consideration is that having two lenses is lighter in the hand.

Lighter in the hand?! What does that even mean and why does it thing? I know, I know, merely, information technology’s one of those YMMV things. Every bit someone who e’er has the photographic camera in the hand, ready to shoot, weight in the hand also matters to me and not just total weight in the handbag.

I’thousand not the type who keeps the camera in the bag and merely brings information technology out to shoot something. If I’grand walking around, actively looking for scenes, then my photographic camera is in my hand. That’s how I shoot.

There are days where I’thou walking all day, shooting thousands of images, and a heavy lens volition lead to wrist pain.

Then, you take to be clear on your priorities and what your shooting style is. Do you similar irresolute lenses? If not, the Tamron is the articulate winner. Do you lot value conditions sealing? Get the Tamron. Do yous want to comport a bright prime number? So it’ll make more than sense pairing information technology with the 18-135mm.

Tamron 17-70mm f/two.8 vs Sony xvi-55mm f/2.8 Yard (SEL1655G)

The Sony 16-55mm f/ii.8 is a Chiliad lens featuring Sony’southward latest linear AF motors. That automatically means 1 thing – it is the all-time for shooting fast action (i.e. burst fashion with continuous AF) and is likewise, by default, the virtually expensive. But, it also covers less range than the Tamron.

It does have the advantage of a slightly wider field of view, just in this example, I don’t find information technology to be a big advantage vs the Tamron.

If the Tamron were an 18mm, instead of 17mm, I would find the Sony’southward 16mm reward to be worth considering, since we’re then talking about 24mm vs 28mm equivalent.

But 17mm vs 16mm isn’t a big deal, for me (24mm vs 25.5mm equivalent). In this case, I’d rather accept the Tamron’south extra reach. YMMV.

The other advantages of the Sony over the Tamron are in build quality and improve optics (i.e. it relies less on software correction). Information technology is also smaller than the Tamron, albeit, not that much lighter. The Sony M lens is simply 30 grams lighter.

For the vast bulk of united states, the Tamron is but the much better value vs the Sony sixteen-55mm GM. It has prototype stabilization, covers a longer focal range, is too weather sealed, and is significantly cheaper while offering about like AF performance.

Equally you can tell from the proper name of this website, I prefer modest and lightweight lenses. This is one of those rare instances where I volition recommend the slightly bigger and heavier one.

Size comparison vs Sony 16-55mm f/2.8 and Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8

Tamron 17-70mm principal specs:

  • Toll: Check the electric current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 25.5-105mm
  • Filter thread size: 67mm
  • Size – Length x diameter: 4.7″ x 2.9″
  • Weight: 525 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 19cm or 17.5 inches

Best everyday lens for the Sony a6400 (Prime lens)

Sony E 35mm f/1.8 OSS

Best everyday carry lens Sony 35mm f/1.8 low light sample image

The smashing fifty for Sony’s APS-C E-mount.

It’south lightweight and tiny, cheap, fast and has optical image stabilization (OSS). What’s not to like?

The simply con is that information technology isn’t crazy sharp corner to corner when shot wide-open. But at this cost indicate, whose lament?

Stop it downward to f/4 and sharpness improves noticeably. At these apertures, it’s slightly sharper than the other alternative in this focal length – the Sigma 30mm f/ane.iv. More on this lens below.

Optical image stabilization is keen to take, peculiarly since the majority of Sony ASP-C cameras don’t have IBIS.

Autofocus is fast and silent, great for both stills and videos. And the 52.5mm equivalent field of view is what is typically called a ‘normal’ lens.

‘Normal’ meaning that information technology’s roughly the same as how our eyes see the globe. Not too wide, not too zoomed in.

Add the bright f/i.eight discontinuity, and you’re good to go.

Sony E 35mm f/1.8 bokeh rendering sample

A good everyday lens means that you’re set for virtually anything, without needing some other lens, all while beingness portable.

It’south long enough and bright enough to get you some beautiful groundwork blur when shooting portraits, but information technology’s not too long that you’ll find it limiting for everyday scenes.

Sony 35mm f/1. OSS vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN

If you whorl below, you’ll run across that I recommend the Sigma as the amend depression light prime number lens.

But, I generally recommend the Sony 35mm f/i.viii OSS as the better all-rounder.

If you generally photograph people in low lite, I’ll recommend the Sigma 30mm f/1.four. Provided that you’re okay with the size and weight increase. Every bit you tin can see below, the Sigma is quite a bit larger, only it still isn’t a big lens. The Sony E 35mm is one of the smallest lenses for the Sony a6400 and the APS-C line.

Size comparison Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4

For virtually everyone else – if you shoot a good mix of people, street/urban scapes, nutrient – I recommend the Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS equally your everyday bear prime lens.

The other consideration is weather sealing – the Sigma has it, the Sony doesn’t take it.

Note: Make certain you’re getting the correct lens. The lens you want is the Sony East 35mm f/1.viii OSS, model number SEL35F18. Don’t misfile it with the Sony FE 35mm f/1.eight for full frame, model number SEL35F18F.

When mounted on the a6400, a6100 or other Sony APS-C cameras, both lenses will work the same, albeit the 35mm OSS lens will be smaller and lighter.

When mounted on a full frame Sony camera, the FE 35mm will work similar a ‘real’ 35mm lens (no more than ingather factor), while the 35mm OSS lens will but work in “crop mode” and not in full frame mode. This means that, on a total frame photographic camera like the Sony a7III, which is a 24MP photographic camera, the 35mm OSS volition take the same field of view every bit on the a6400, a6100 etc… only it will ‘crop’ the image to only 10 megapixels.

Sony 35mm Due east chief specs:

  • Cost: Check the current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 52.5mm
  • Filter thread size: 49mm
  • Size – Length x diameter: 1.77″ 10 ii.48″
  • Weight: 154 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 30cm or 11.81 inches

Best low lite lens for the Sony a6400

Sigma 30mm f/i.4 DC DN Contemporary

With a 45mm-equivalent field of view, this is a “standard” lens for Sony a6000, a6100, a6400 series cameras.

Sigma’s DC DN designation refers to lenses which were specifically designed for crop-sensor (DC) and mirrorless (DN) systems. In contrast, full frame mirrorless are designated equally DG DN.

Sigma currently has three prime lenses in this DC DN gimmicky range – the 16mm f/1.4, the 56mm f/1.4 and this 30mm f/i.4.

They are some of the virtually important lenses ever made in the history of mirrorless cameras. I child you not.

The best Sigma prime lenses for Sony E mount

These trio of lenses, take single handedly rounded out the lens line-ups of entire ingather sensor mirrorless systems.

Beginning, for the Sony East mount. And also for Catechism’s EF-M organization. And, more recently, for the Leica L mount (APS-C). These Sigma trio of primes have single handedly plugged holes in these systems.

They are also available for the micro four thirds system for Olympus and Panasonic cameras, although their impact in that location wasn’t every bit big as on the aforementioned systems.

You could really buy the set, and be fix ;). They cover the almost used focal lengths by a daily shooter, they are fast, they are atmospheric condition sealed, and they are affordable. Yous tin can buy the whole prepare for under $1000.

When these lenses came out, there wasn’t a lot of option in affordable, fast primes in these focal ranges on Sony E mount.

There still isn’t today. The 16mm f/1.iv for example, doesn’t really take any competition. All other ultra broad primes in this range are slower and optically inferior.

Anyway, back to this lens –

If you’ve used the erstwhile Sigma 30mm f/1.iv DC for DSLR mounts (Nikon, Catechism, etc..) have annotation that this is NOT the same lens.

This lens is much improve. By a country mile.

Information technology is an entirely new blueprint, and not just a ported DSLR design (which Sigma does for some of their lenses). Those lenses don’t sport the “DN” designation.

Honestly, there isn’t much to say about this lens.

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 portrait bokeh sample

It’s sharp and bokeh rendering and fall-off is cute.

It’due south a not bad standard lens. Because of its f/1.4 discontinuity and its rounded nine-blade diaphragm, it tin work as a great indoor portrait lens.

The downside? The but downside I can think of is that the AF motor is audible. I wouldn’t call information technology noisy or distracting, but information technology is there, especially when compared to the silent AF in e.g. the Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS.

This lens was the first of the Sigma trio, and was released prior to the 16mm and 56mm. Information technology’due south AF motors are older, and not as silent. But, it yet plays nicely with eye AF and continuous AF.

Which brings us to – which lens should you lot selection: Sigma 30mm f/i.4 DC DN vs the Sony E 35mm f/1.8 OSS?

Both are in the same price range. The Sony has silent AF and has paradigm stabilization (OSS), while the Sigma has the brighter discontinuity?

Well.. it depends.

If y’all scroll upward above, yous’ll encounter I recommend the Sony 35mm f/ane.eight every bit the better everyday lens.

A lot of that has to do with the size. The Sony is just more portable, which is a big deal if you conduct your camera everywhere.

The optical image stabilization (OSS) on the Sony also helps a lot in eking out that extra bit of sharpness out of slower shutter speeds when shooting static scenes.

But, when you’re shooting moving subjects in low light, nothing beats lens brightness, because it will help you keep your ISO downwards when shooting higher shutter speeds to freeze movement.

That’s where the Sigma’south f/1.4 comes in. Plus, if paired with a body with IBIS, similar the Sony a6600, the Sony 35mm f/1.8 losses some of its OSS advantage.

I detect the Sigma to be the better lens for “social” situations in low light, indoor places. Size bated, information technology’s better for documenting e.g. birthdays, chasing your kid around the living room etc.. vs the Sony 35mm f/1.8.

The Sony will have the advantage when shooting non-moving subjects (landscapes, street architecture, food) considering the OSS will allow you lot to handhold at slower shutter speeds. Just, for everything else (except portability), the Sigma wins.

f/1.iv vs f/ane.eight doesn’t sound like much, but there is a noticeable difference in background blur that even the Sony’southward longer focal length can’t make upwards for.

Overall, similar its stable-mates, the 30mm f/1.4 is an incredible value punching well above its cost tag, plus, information technology’s weather sealed also.

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 Size when mounted on Sony a6400 camera

Sigma 30mm f/1.4 main specs:

  • Price: Check the current cost on Amazon
  • Total frame equivalent focal length: 45mm
  • Filter thread size: 52mm
  • Size – Length x diameter: two.ix″ ten two.55″
  • Weight: 265 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 30cm or 11.81 inches

Best Macro Lens for the Sony a6400

Sony Due east 30mm f/iii.5 Macro lens

Capable of truthful one:1 macro (lifesize reproduction), this is an excellent macro lens for beginners.

This is a great option for those shooting close-ups of flowers and product images, such as jewellery etc…

Just exist enlightened that i:1 macro is reached at the minimum focusing distance of iii.74 inches. This means that you lot need to exist very shut to your subject to go lifesize reproduction, and you adventure blocking some light because your camera and lens volition be very close to the subject.

Best macro lens for Sony a6100, a6400

Alternative Macro Lenses – the Sony FE 50mm f/2.8 (SEL50M28) or Sony Iron 90mm f/two.8 G (SEL90M28G)

For insects or for other macro piece of work where you want to accept some distance between y’all and your subject, you volition be better off with either the Sony Iron 50mm f/2.8 Macro or the Sony Atomic number 26 90mm f/2.8 Chiliad lens.

Both lenses are total frame lenses, and toll more the 30mm f/3.five. Only, on a ingather sensor camera like the a6000 or a6400, they are equivalent to the field of view of a 75mm and 135mm lens, respectively. This ways that your working distance from field of study to camera widens quite a chip.

On advantage of the 90mm f/2.eight is that information technology tin besides double as an
portrait lens – provided yous take the infinite. 135mm-equivalent on a ingather sensor is pretty long for some indoor situations.

Only, if you’re simply getting started with macro, the Sony 30mm f/3.5 is hard to beat out. It’s relatively cheap, it’s meaty, and it’south crazy sharp.

Sony 30mm macro primary specs:

  • Price: Bank check the current price on Amazon
  • Total frame equivalent focal length: 45mm
  • Filter thread size: 49mm
  • Size – Length ten Diameter: two.nineteen″ x 2.44″
  • Weight: 138 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 9cm or three.74 inches

Best portrait lens for the Sony a6400

Sigma 56mm f/ane.4
DC DN Gimmicky

Sample portrait image from Sigma 56mm f/1.4

This lens is one of the best examples of why APS-C still holds a lot of advantages over total frame.

Information technology’south fast, tiny, weather sealed and will get y’all some gorgeous bokeh.

The equivalency-army volition tell you that this is “only” equivalent to an 85mm f/2 full frame lens. While they are technically wrong, they aren’t far off either.

And, that’southward actually a proficient thing.

With a field of view roughly equivalent to 84mm in full frame terms, this is the perfect portrait focal length.

The f/i.iv discontinuity volition render some flossy bokeh, indistinguishable from full frame in most scenarios.

All in a lens that is smaller, lighter and cheaper than the “equivalent” full frame lens!

Here it is – with its hood! – side by side to the full frame Sony 85mm f/one.8 Iron, sans hood. That’s a meaning difference in the hand, and in the pocketbook. Especially if you consider that this focal length isn’t a typical walk effectually lens. Unless you’re specifically going out to shoot head and shoulder portraits, these lenses typically start the day in your purse.

Size comparison APS-C vs full frame 56mm vs 85mm

Anyways, I’ve always found 85mm to exist a great portrait focal length. Long enough to minimize facial distortion and requite flossy backgrounds, but not also long that you’ll take a difficult fourth dimension using it indoors.

Yes, a real 85mm lens mounted on a ingather sensor would requite you thinner depth of field, but at a ~127mm field of view equivalent, it’southward an outdoor-simply lens for most people.

There is more to portraits than simply thin depth of field.

This lens has great bokeh, smoother even than some longer lenses. What’s as of import is the quality and rendering of the bokeh, not just the quantity.

f/one.iv is absolutely fantastic for low lite shooting. It also helps in maintaining higher shutter speeds for photographing kids in motion, for example.

I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again, lens pattern is all about compromises.

A good lens, is nearly making the right compromises. A perfect lens is optically perfect, only is big and heavy and expensive.

This is a lens that makes the right compromises.

It has just the correct amount of sharpness and contrast at f/ane.four, with beautiful autumn-off and pleasant and smooth bokeh.

Stop information technology down to f/iv, and it’south similar a completely different lens. It’southward precipitous, sharp, precipitous. Likewise sharp, even.

There is some vignetting broad-open, and corner sharpness suffers a bit at f/1.iv to f/ii. Overall, aberrations are well controlled. It also works perfectly with eye AF fifty-fifty at f/one.4. Abrupt eyes, flossy bokeh, information technology’southward simply cute.

Would it be better if this lens had image stabilization? Perchance. But it wouldn’t exist this small and light. It would be more expensive also.

Bokeh sample of Sigma 56mm f/1.4

If you moved to mirrorless because of the promise of smaller and better optics, or if you ignore the full frame railroad train because you lot don’t like big and heavy lenses – then this lens is for yous.

It is an EXCEPTIONAL value, and there is very piddling here not to like.

It’s 1 of those lenses that yous look to simply exist ‘okay’ or ‘good enough’ because of the price. Just the results will blow you abroad.

Sigma 56mm f/1.4 chief specs:

  • Price: Check the electric current price on Amazon
  • Total frame equivalent focal length: 84mm
  • Filter thread size: 55mm
  • Size – Length ten diameter: 2.34″ ten 2.62″
  • Weight: 280 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 50cm or 19.7 inches

Best ultra wide-angle lens and mural lens for the Sony a6400

Sony 10-18mm f/4 OSS

Best ultrawide lens for Sony a6400, a6100 landscape image

An oldie, only a goodie.

The lens for big skies and vast landscapes.

Nearing 10 years since it was released, some people say Sony should update this lens to become a 10-24mm.

Personally, I don’t see the demand.

Yes, ten-24mm would be a more useful focal range, but it’s almost guaranteed to be bigger and heavier.

Sometimes, Sony gets a lot of flak for its APS-C line-upward. Whiners say it’due south not updated every bit fast equally their total frame line-upwardly, that in that location aren’t enough “pro” lenses etc.. etc..

But if yous actually wait at Sony’s APS-C lineup, their cameras included, you’ll see that they have washed their best to stay true to the APS-C mirrorless ethos – that of small and compact.

Sony’s APS-C line-upwardly may non be as all-encompassing as others – but their lenses are as well decidedly smaller and lighter compared to others.

And the Sony 10-18mm is a perfect example of that.

With a 15-28mm equivalent field of view, this lens is the all-time lens for vast landscapes.

But, if that’southward not your matter, this lens can do a lot more than.

It’south also the best lens for interiors and real estate photography.

Best Sony lens for real estate for Sony a6400, a6100, a6300

Its lightweight and meaty design also makes information technology a great lens for video gimbal work. It extends but a tiny bit when zooming, but not enough that you lot need to completely re-residual your gimbal every fourth dimension.

Optical image stabilization (OSS) is also a welcome addition, especially since it did not result on a larger lens.

This is non simply great for hand property lower shutter speeds in low light (due east.g. not so well lit interiors) but it’southward also great for reducing micro-shakes for video.

Even when you’re on a three-centrality gimbal, having OSS on notwithstanding results in noticeably less shake vs simply using the gimbal without OSS.

At that place aren’t a lot of UWA choices for Sony APS-C. You’re either looking at a prime number like the
Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8
or a manual focus lens like the
Samyang 12mm f/ii.

Either you’ll honey that this lens is small and compact, or y’all’re disappointed that information technology isn’t a weather sealed 10-24mm.

This isn’t a super crazy sharp lens, only it is more than sharp enough for all simply the ultimate pixel peepers. The simply other complaint I tin can make is the lack of weather condition sealing. But the size advantages more than than make-up for it.

For instance, for real estate videos where quick gear up-up on a gimbal is great to have, this lens is difficult to beat.

It’s as well a great hiking lens. When every gram counts, but you also want the flexibility of a zoom vs a prime, you’ll be grateful that you have a lightweight zoom lens with keen quality.

The size and weight of this lens is difficult to convey in a review. If you don’t hold information technology in your hand, and compare it to 10-24mm lenses from other brands, or to full frame lenses, it’due south hard to appreciate.

But it actually is a fraction of the size and weight of pretty much any zoom alternative. Taking everything into consideration, this lens is pretty much weightless.

Tin yous use the 10-18mm f/4 on full frame cameras?

Yes – to a certain extent.

You lot can of course mount it on total frame cameras on crop mode, where it will behave exactly like it would on an APS-C body.

But, what if you want to apply information technology in full frame mode?

It will really piece of work in full frame mode – giving you existent full frame coverage from 14-16mm.

Anything wider or longer than that and yous’ll start seeing the corners of the lens.

So, no, it’s not really recommended. Just it is a dainty bonus, if you need it. Simply I wouldn’t go out and buy this specifically to use at 14-16mm on a full frame torso.

Sony 10-18mm chief specs:

  • Price: Check the electric current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 15-28mm
  • Filter thread size: 62mm
  • Size – Length x diameter: 2.5″ x ii.76″
  • Weight: 225 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 25cm or 9.84 inches

All-time lens for video for the Sony a6400 (zoom)

Sony Eastward PZ xviii-105mm f/four OSS M

For the longest time, prior to the release of the 16-55 and 70-350 G lenses, this was the merely consumer G lens in Sony’s APS-C lineup.

Prior to this lens, the only other lens with a “Thou” designation was the Sony 18-110mm f/iv 1000 OSS, which is an
Cinematics lens.

At present that the landscape has changed with the release of lenses like the Sony 18-135mm and the Tamron 17-70mm f/ii.eight, does this lens still make sense?

Yeah, information technology does. Because this lens has some unique advantages for video work.

Compared to the Sony xviii-135mm, this of course has a constant f/iv aperture. The constant f/4 aperture is particularly useful if you lot operate the zoom while filming, because that means your exposure remains constant as you lot zoom in and out.

The downside is that this is a larger lens than the 18-135mm and has less reach.

Optically, the lens is excellent, merely the 18-135mm has the reward in corner to corner sharpness, even at similar apertures. But that’s but noticeable in side-by-side comparisons. The eighteen-105mm is however plenty sharp.

Compared to the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8, the large advantage of this lens is its ability zoom characteristic and its internal zooming design.

The ‘PZ’ in the lens designation means this is one of the few lenses with a ability zoom mechanism.

That ways that you can smoothly operate the zoom via a zoom rocker on the side of the lens. Information technology’southward like to the zoom lever y’all see on camcorders.

You can still zoom the lens using the regular zoom ring, just using the power zoom rocker does have a lot of advantages.

For one, you eliminate the jerkiness of zooming via the zoom band, and y’all’ll take meliorate control on how fast or slow you zoom.

If you’ve e’er tried zooming with a zoom band while filming, you’ll know that no matter how you endeavour to operate it smoothly, footage volition be more often than not unwatchable. Either you buy a actually expensive cinematics lens, or, you become this –  a lens with a power zoom.

Although it gives upward one end of light vs the Tamron 17-70mm at comparable focal lengths – the 18-105mm does yet take other advantages.

Get-go, information technology is an internal zoom design. That means the lens doesn’t become longer when y’all zoom out. This is particularly useful for gimbal work, since you won’t exist rebalancing the gimbal as yous change focal lengths.

The weight will however shift a chip, since internal lens elements will even so move as you zoom and out, but it does mean less strain on your gimbal motors compared to a lens that physically gets longer and shorter as you zoom in and out.

The second advantage over the Tamron is of course the longer reach. The Tamron tops out at 105mm-equivalent while this goes noticeably longer at 157mm-equivalent. Using the excellent clear epitome zoom characteristic while filming 4K video, you lot can even go longer, increasing its versatility.

What most groundwork mistiness?

Background blur for Sony 18-105mm f/4 sample

An f/four lens isn’t really what you go to if you want creamy backgrounds. But, as you can see above, it is doable, in a pinch.

As long every bit you have space, shooting wide-open at f/4 at the tele end (105mm) will give you very similar background blur every bit the Tamron 17-70mm f/two.8 at 70mm f/2.8.

Of course, the Tamron volition accept a one stop advantage at all other similar focal lengths.

The Sony’due south rounded aperture blades also helps with its bokeh rendering.

Autofocus for stills and video is fast and accurate, even in dim lighting.

So, you have to be really clear on what yous want. Do you primarily do video? Or practice you mostly shoot stills and occasionally shoot short clips?

Another way of looking at information technology would be – exercise you need the advantages that this lens give for video? Primarily the power zoom, the constant aperture, and the internal zoom mechanism?

If not, take a look at the Sony 18-135mm or the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.viii (scroll to the top, these are the kickoff and second lenses discussed in this article, respectively.)

Sony 18-105mm f/4 chief specs:

  • Toll: Bank check the electric current toll on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 28-157mm
  • Filter thread size: 72mm
  • Size – Length x diameter: 4.33″ x 3″
  • Weight: 427 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 45cm or 17.7 inches

Best lens for vlogging and video (prime lens)

Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Gimmicky

Handheld vlogging with the camera at artillery length and home studio set-ups typically crave a wide angle lens.

That’s not hard to find – your 16-50mm kit lens can do that. Even your iPhone with its 26mm equivalent ‘wide’ lens can do that, no problems.

Simply, what they tin can’t practice, is give you that beautiful blurry background while maintaining a broad angle of view.

This is where the ultrawide Sigma 16mm f/i.iv comes in. That amazingly vivid f/i.4 aperture tin requite you some beautiful background mistiness while still being wide enough for vlogging.

The big downside – and it could be a deal breaker for some – is that it doesn’t have image stabilization. Not a huge deal if you have the Sony a6600, but for the a6000, a6100, a6400 with no IBIS? Something to consider.

The other option is the Sony 10-18mm f/four, which goes even wider and does characteristic optical steady shot (OSS) stabilization. Only, the trouble with this lens is that it only goes to f/4.

That’southward a total 3 stops LESS than the Sigma. If you lot’re filming in depression light, iii stops is the difference between dainty, useable footage at ISO 1600 vs grainy, pixelated footage at ISO 12800. That’s a big deal.

If you’re mostly walking around conveying the camera at arms length during the solar day, then yeah, get the Sony 10-18mm f/4.

But for everything else – you’re meliorate off with the Sigma 16mm f/one.4 and making as much employ of a pocket-size tripod plus warp stabilizer in Premiere.

Even for a domicile studio fix-up with lights, that f/1.4 really gives a nice look for talking head videos.

Sigma 16mm f/ane.4 main specs:

  • Price: Check the current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 24mm
  • Filter thread size: 67mm
  • Size – Length x diameter: 3.63″ x 2.84″
  • Weight: 405 grams
  • Minimum focusing altitude: 25cm or 9.84 inches

Best telephoto lens for sports and wildlife

Sony 70-350mm f/ii.viii Yard OSS

Sony 70-350mm G OSS sample image

It took Sony a while elevation plug this hole in their line-up. Only, oh boy, did they deliver.

It’due south piece of cake to say that this is the best telephoto lens AND the best sports lens AND the all-time lens for wild fauna on the Sony a6100, a6400, a6600 series, because information technology’s the Merely high performance telephoto in the lineup right?

No, it really is quite adept. And if you consider that it has an MSRP of less than $1000, it’s an incredible lens.

This lens is smaller and lighter than the equivalent 100-400mm telephoto lenses on full frame – while delivering fifty-fifty longer reach on crop sensor a6000 serial cameras (it becomes an effective 105-525mm!)

If y’all’re a sports or wildlife shooter, that alone is enough reason to pony upwardly for an APS-C trunk for this lens.

What Sony was able to do with the size here can’t be nether-stated. They are enroaching on micro four thirds territory here. Plus, you get the do good of Sony’s superior AF performance.

What makes this lens an incredible performer is Sony’s conclusion to use its XD LM (Farthermost Dynamic Linear Motor) engineering science to bulldoze the focus and lens elements.

This is the same AF technology in the Sony 135mm f/1.8 GM lens as well equally the $13,000 Sony 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS. Information technology’s silent, fast and authentic and can go on up with the continuous AF algorithms of today’s high speed cameras.

This being a G lens, Sony also includes a customizable button (defaults to focus concord). Optical image stabilization (OSS) is likewise included, which is a necessity for such a long focal length. Non but is this necessary at the longest cease of the zoom, it’south actually great in stabilizing your ‘view’ through the viewfinder.

As someone who really does Not shoot wild fauna or birds or airshows, this isn’t a lens I would typically have in my bag.

But, every bit a parent with an active kid, I’ve come to enjoy shooting with this lens. It has also get my default landscape lens.

I’m not a big landscape shooter, only when I do shoot ‘scapes, I prefer the compression from a telephoto vs shooting with an ultra-wide.

This is probably my to the lowest degree used lens out of all lenses (and photographic camera systems) I own, but I tin say that information technology is worth every penny.

If, like me, y’all care well-nigh performance AND size and weight, you lot’d probably be willing to pay More than for this lens. That it costs what it costs is but crazy to me.

If you are an occasional telephoto zoom shooter like me, this is just a no-brainer. It costs significantly less than the full frame Sony 100-400 GM, is nevertheless less expensive than the Sigma 100-400mm DG DN, and is half the weight of those lenses.

The full frame Sony 200-600mm Thousand OSS is larger and heavier yet, weighing over 3kg. An a6600 and the 70-350mm will clock in at less than half that. Which philharmonic would you rather acquit when hiking or birding?

I can’t really call back of any cons to this lens. Maybe that it lacks a tripod mount? For what I use this lens for, it’s not an issue for me. It’south small and calorie-free, a tripod mount would just get in the mode. But, peradventure birders or wild animals shooters will miss having a tripod pes.

Sony 70-350mm size on Sony a6400

Sony 70-350mm Yard master specs:

  • Price: Cheque the current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 105-525mm
  • Filter thread size: 67mm
  • Size – Length x bore: five.59″ x 3.03″
  • Weight: 625 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 1.1 meters or three.61 inches

Best pancake lens for the Sony a6400

Sony Due east 20mm f/2.viii (SEL20F28)

Smallest lenses for Sony APS-C E-mount

One of two* pancake lenses for Sony E-mountain crop sensor cameras, the Sony 20mm f/2.8 is significantly better than the other pick (The Sony East 16mm f/2.8)

*Other people like to throw in the Sigma 19mm f/ii.viii DN lens into the give-and-take, just it’due south not a pancake lens at all.

The Sony 20mm f/ii.8 is a truthful pancake, sticking out less than an inch from your photographic camera.

If you lot want ultimate portability and discreteness, this is what you desire.

It’s non a lens that’s going to win awards for sharpness or optical prowess. Let’south get that out of the way first.

The reason you lot desire this lens is because you want the smallest possible lens on your camera, while maintaining auto focus, and with a jack-of-all-trades focal length.

That’due south not to say that it’s optically bad – it’s more decent – but it doesn’t compare well to other lenses in the same focal range, peculiarly in the corners. Of course, those other lenses are also much bigger.

Information technology IS sharper than the xvi-50mm kit lens though.

Paired with the smaller a6000 series cameras, like the a6100, information technology’south almost like carrying a point and shoot.

Information technology’s ‘only’ f/2.eight, which is why I did non recommend it as the all-time walk-around lens, but for those who don’t need anything faster, and who prefer a wider field of view than the Sony Eastward 35mm f/one.viii OSS, this is hands a great choice that is more portable.

This lens is too compatible with the Sony VCL-ECU2 0.75x ultra wide converter. This nice, little add together on lens is made in Nihon and screws on to the front of the lens, giving you a wider field of view (24mm-equivalent). Information technology’s an inexpensive way to add versatility to your set-up, although with the converter attached, your lens won’t be a pancake anymore.

Sony 20mm f/2.8 vs Sony 16mm f/2.8

Okay, so, why pick the 20mm over the other pancake lens in Sony’s line-up?

More often than not, I’d recommend that y’all choice based on focal length preferences.

The 16mm f/2.eight (24mm-equivalent field of view) is very slightly larger (not enough to make a difference in portability) – but it is also less sharp than the Sony 20mm f/2.eight.

Generally, if you want a pancake lens, y’all’re as well looking for a 1-lens solution that will keep your camera as small as possible. For nearly people, the 20mm f/2.8 is the more flexible focal length.

Just, if y’all’re looking for a walk-around combo, maybe the 16mm would fit your needs, depending on what other lens yous programme to have with you.

For example, for walking effectually with either the Sony Eastward 35mm f/1.eight OSS or the Sigma 30mm f/1.4, the Sony 16mm f/2.8 pancake would be the better option, since it gaps better with those lenses.

The 20mm f/2.8 would be too close in focal length to the 35mm or 30mm.

Only, if you’re walking around with a portrait lens or a short telephoto similar the Sigma 56mm f/1.4 or the Sony Eastward 50mm f/ane.viii OSS, the 20mm f/ii.8 would be the improve pair.

The 16mm f/2.8 could be too far, leaving too big a gap.

Once more, it all depends on shooting style and focal length preferences.

The important thing is, either of these pancake lenses tin can fit in your pocket.

The Sony E 16mm f/two.8 is also uniform with the Sony VCL-ECU2 0.75x ultra broad converter, turning that lens into ane with an 18mm field of view.

That’s quite a bit wider. Only, this is where the sharpness advantage of the 20mm f/2.8 comes in. Paired with the converter, sharpness degrades farther. And the 16mm f/2.8 has less sharpness to first with, and adding the converter might be a step too far for some people.

Over again, it’south not that information technology’southward unusable. Information technology’s just not great when shot wide-open, fifty-fifty for moderate pixel peepers.

And since about of the things yous want to shoot at 18mm are landscapes and interiors, you might detect yourself a bit disappointed if you lot pixel peep a bit.

If you lot don’t pixel peep, and but desire great images for web sharing or social media, information technology is highly recommended. Information technology’south difficult to find an ultra-wide 18mm lens at this size and price, with autofocus.

Sony pancake lens for street photography

Sony 20mm f/2.8 pancake lens primary specs:

  • Price: Check the electric current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 30mm
  • Filter thread size: 49mm
  • Size – Length 10 diameter: 0.viii″ x 2.46″
  • Weight: 69 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 20cm or 7.87 inches

Best lens for street photography

Sony Zeiss 24mm f/one.8  Sonnar T* (SEL2418Z)

Looking for the all-time street photography lens is sometimes like request people what their favorite food is.

You’re going to go a lot of different answers, a lot of them very opinionated, likewise.

Well, here is my very opinionated answer too.

A lot of street photography comes down to comfort level. How close can you become to your subjects?

Don’t know nevertheless? Why not start with a zoom, like the 16-50mm kit lens?

Want to work from a comfortable distance without the compression of a telephoto? Outset with a normal lens like the Sony E 35mm f/ane.8 OSS or the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN.

Want to get up close and personal? Stick with a wide lens like the Sigma 16mm f/1.4.

Just want the smallest and most detached lens? Go the Sony 20mm f/2.8 pancake lens discussed above (scroll up a bit).

Want to know what I recommend information technology?

It’s the Sony Zeiss 24mm f/1.viii Sonnar.

Sony Zeiss 24mm f/1.8 size on Sony a6000

Information technology’s not cheap, unfortunately.

On the Sony a6000 serial, a6100, a6300, a6500 etc.. this lens sees like a 36mm lens.

Close enough to the 35mm focal length that is considered the “classic” street photography focal length by many street photographers.

The smashing thing about a ’35’ is that it is neither likewise wide or besides tight. Information technology’due south wide enough and so that you can layer your street photographs, wide plenty to add together drama if you shoot close, but not besides wide that it adds a lot of distortion.

Information technology’due south also long enough that you tin shoot wide-open with a fast-ish aperture and still have some form of subject isolation.

A lot of success with street photography comes downwards to just watching and waiting.

Watching scenes evolve, watching the ebb and flow of people, waiting for the correct lite.

And, bringing the photographic camera upwards to your centre when the elements come together. Click. Camera goes back down. It all happens in a separate second.

Apparently, the homo eyes see at well-nigh 55 degrees field of view. That’s approximately the field of view of a 43mm lens (in full frame terms).

Well, in my opinion, when we’re beingness observant, like when we’re shooting street photography, we see a bit wider than that.

In other words, the 35mm field of view (or thereabouts) is perfect.

Why is this important?

Considering when you lot’re standing there watching and observing, mentally framing the scene – in that location isn’t a lot of divergence between what y’all see and what you encounter through the 35mm (equivalent) lens when you finally enhance the camera up to your middle.

I hope that makes sense.

Merely, why this particular lens?

Well, there isn’t a lot of choice in this focal range, unfortunately.

Plus, this lens has a lot going for it. Whether it’due south worth the price tag, I leave that up to you lot to decide.

First, what are the downsides?

The outset is price. Unfortunately, you’re paying a fair bit of Zeiss revenue enhancement here.

The second is the lack of weather sealing. At this price point, I’d await a lens to be at least dust and moisture proof.

That’due south about it.

What makes this lens worth it, for me?

Sony Zeiss 24mm f/1.8 street photography sample

First, is the contrast. Maybe it’s that fabulous Zeiss magic?

Technically, it probably sort of is. The great contrast and micro-contrast out of this lens is likely partly due to the coatings that Zeiss uses.

Is that a big deal? Possibly. But if y’all post-process all your photos, and then not really.

Y’all can go 98% of the look with another lens and working on it in mail.

But, if yous like not bad straight-out-of-camera contrast, this lens delivers.

Information technology’s particularly bang-up for blackness and white. Set your camera to the black and white profile, +two contrast, -4 sharpness. This lens will sing.

Second, is its versatility.

The f/ane.8 aperture isn’t a big deal in the streets, unless you lot shoot a lot in low calorie-free.

For the manner I shoot the streets, I’m actually at f/4 to f/11 most of the fourth dimension.

But, it’south when you lot take a interruption from the streets that the f/one.8 comes in useful. If I’k traveling with my family unit, I’m shooting street scenes, then I decided to have a pause, see up with them in a lovely buffet etc.. I won’t need to change lenses, or bring another lens. This lens can transition from street to family documentary in a heart beat. Plus, that f/1.viii tin save you the trouble of lugging around a tripod just to shoot the occasional low light architecture shot.

Best street photography lens for Sony a6400, a6100 series

Sony Zeiss 24mm main specs:

  • Price: Check the electric current price on Amazon
  • Full frame equivalent focal length: 36mm
  • Filter thread size: 49mm
  • Size – Length ten diameter: 2.58″ ten 2.48″
  • Weight: 225 grams
  • Minimum focusing distance: 16cm or 6.3 inches

Are there any cheaper alternatives to the Sony Zeiss 24mm f/1.8?

Aye! You lot’re non entirely out of luck here. But, that volition mean looking at third party lens options.

Viltrox 23mm f/1.iv Autofocus STM for Sony E-mount

This is an auto focus lens from Viltrox, and unlike the other lenses below, this lens is designed specifically for APS-C. That means that this is the closest in size to the Zeiss lens.

Coming in at a 3rd of the price of the Zeiss lens, you’d recollect this lens would exist a poor performer, only information technology’s not. It’southward more than decent actually.

Information technology’due south not as sharp, merely it gets you 80% of the style there. You won’t find it in well-nigh scenarios. The bokeh rendering is different though. The Viltrox has a more distinct rendering, with a tiny bit of a swirl. It’s a pretty absurd look.

The AF motor is surprisingly adept and plays nice with Sony’s eye AF and animal eye AF.

The most annoying thing about this lens is the big, assuming lettering announcing the lens proper name (why?).

The aperture band is a prissy bear on, but as with well-nigh Viltrox lenses released and so far, it’south a clickless discontinuity band. That’s smashing for video, but information technology leads to a “discrete” shooting experience for stills.

Samyang 24mm f/one.8 FE – Samyang/Rokinon tiny lens series

This is actually a full frame lens, designed by South korea’south Samyang Optics (sometimes sold under the Rokinon brand) for Sony’southward FE cameras, like the Sony a7iii, a7riii etc… But, it also comes in at one-half the price of the Zeiss 24mm f/1.viii. When mounted on APS-C cameras similar the Sony a6100, this lens works the same as the Zeiss 24mm.

The big advantage is that if y’all also have a total frame E mount photographic camera, or if y’all plan to upgrade in the hereafter, this lens will also work equally a real 24mm lens on those full frame sensors.

The disadvantage is that because it’southward a full frame lens, it’southward a bit larger than the Sony Zeiss 24mm f/1.eight. Although it is only marginally heavier.

But, for a total frame lens, information technology is not obscenely large. It’s part of Samyang’s tiny lens series for full frame, which are some of the smallest lenses for Sony total frame cameras.