Canon 5D Marker Iii vs 7D Mark II
The Catechism EOS 5D Marking 3 and the Canon EOS 7D Mark Two are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in March 2012 and September 2014. Both are
(Digital Unmarried Lens Reflex) cameras that are based on a full frame (5D Marking III) and an APS-C (7D Mark 2) sensor. The 5D Marker III has a resolution of 22.ane megapixels, whereas the 7D Mark Two provides 20 MP.
Beneath is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras equally a starting point for the comparison.
Going across this snapshot of core features and characteristics,
what are the differences
between the Canon EOS 5D Marker III and the Canon EOS 7D Marking 2? Which one should yous buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by proficient reviewers.
An illustration of the concrete size and weight of the Canon 5D Mark Three and the Canon 7D II is provided in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their
relative size. 3 consecutive perspectives from the forepart, the top, and the back are available. All size dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.
If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken equally an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon 7D Two is
notably smaller (five percent)
than the Canon 5D Mark 3. Moreover, the 7D Mark II is
slightly lighter (4 percentage)
than the 5D Mark Three. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are
splash and grit-proof
and can, hence, be used in inclement weather atmospheric condition or harsh environments.
The in a higher place size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the
interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. A larger imaging sensor (as in the 5D Marking Iii) will tend to keep with bigger and heavier lenses, while more compact options are available for the smaller-sensor camera (7D Marker II). You tin compare the eyes available in the Canon EF Lens Catalog.
Concerning battery life, the 5D Mark 3 gets 950 shots out of its LP-E6 bombardment, while the 7D Marking II tin take 670 images on a single charge of its LP-E6N power pack.
The post-obit table
provides a synthesis of the principal physical specifications
of the 2 cameras and other similar ones. If you lot want to switch the focus of the display and review some other camera pair, you can motility across to the CAM-parator tool and choose from the broad selection of possible photographic camera comparisons at that place.
|1.||Canon 5D Marker III||152 mm||116 mm||76 mm||950 k||950||Y||Mar 2012||three,499||ebay.com|
|2.||Canon 7D II||149 mm||112 mm||78 mm||910 g||670||Y||Sep 2014||1,799||ebay.com|
|iii.||Canon 6D Mark Two||144 mm||111 mm||75 mm||765 g||1200||Y||Jun 2017||ane,999||amazon.com|
|4.||Canon 1D X Mark II||158 mm||168 mm||83 mm||1530 grand||1210||Y||Feb 2016||v,999||ebay.com|
|5.||Canon 5D Mark 4||151 mm||116 mm||76 mm||890 yard||900||Y||Aug 2016||3,499||amazon.com|
|6.||Catechism 80D||139 mm||105 mm||79 mm||730 chiliad||960||Y||Feb 2016||ane,199||ebay.com|
|7.||Catechism 5DS||152 mm||116 mm||76 mm||930 thou||700||Y||Feb 2015||3,699||amazon.com|
|eight.||Canon 5DS R||152 mm||116 mm||76 mm||930 g||700||Y||February 2015||3,699||amazon.com|
|9.||Canon 70D||139 mm||104 mm||79 mm||755 1000||920||Y||Jul 2013||i,199||ebay.com|
|ten.||Catechism 6D||145 mm||111 mm||71 mm||770 g||1090||Y||Sep 2012||ii,099||ebay.com|
|xi.||Catechism 60D||145 mm||106 mm||79 mm||755 thousand||1100||Y||Aug 2010||1,399||ebay.com|
|12.||Canon 7D||148 mm||111 mm||74 mm||860 g||800||Y||Sep 2009||ane,699||ebay.com|
|13.||Canon 5D Marking II||152 mm||114 mm||75 mm||850 grand||850||Y||Sep 2008||3,499||ebay.com|
|fourteen.||Canon 5D||152 mm||113 mm||75 mm||895 g||400||Y||Aug 2005||3,299||ebay.com|
|Notation: Measurements and pricing do non include easily detachable parts, such as add-on or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.|
Any camera decision will plain take relative prices into business relationship. The listed launch prices provide an indication of the
that the manufacturer of the cameras take been targeting. The 7D Mark Ii was launched at a markedly lower cost (by 49 percent) than the 5D Marking III, which puts it into a different market segment. Ordinarily, retail prices stay at first close to the launch cost, but afterwards several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is most to appear, farther discounting and stock clearance sales often button the camera price considerably down. And so, after the new model is out, very good deals tin can oft be plant on the pre-endemic marketplace.
The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of
prototype quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a large sensor camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the image and, thus, the ability to better isolate a subject field from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to exist associated with larger, more expensive photographic camera bodies and lenses.
Of the 2 cameras under consideration, the Canon 5D Marker III features
a full frame sensor
and the Canon 7D II
an APS-C sensor. The sensor area in the 7D Marker II is 61 percentage smaller. Every bit a effect of these sensor size differences, the cameras have a format factor of, respectively, 1.0 and i.6. Both cameras accept a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor meridian) of 3:2.
With 22.1MP, the 5D Mark III offers a
than the 7D Mark Two (20MP), but the 5D Mark III nevertheless has larger individual pixels (pixel pitch of 6.25μm versus 4.10μm for the 7D Marker II) due to its larger sensor. However, the 7D Mark Ii is a much more contempo model (past 2 years and half dozen months) than the 5D Mark 3, and its sensor will have benefitted from technological advances during this time that further enhance the low-cal gathering capacity of its pixels.
The resolution advantage of the Canon 5D Mark III implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The
maximum print size
of the 5D Mark Iii for adept quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 28.8 10 xix.2 inches or 73.two ten 48.8 cm, for very good quality (250 dpi) 23 x 15.4 inches or 58.v 10 39 cm, and for excellent quality (300 dpi) 19.2 x 12.8 inches or 48.8 x 32.5 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 7D II are 27.4 ten 18.2 inches or 69.v x 46.3 cm for skillful quality, 21.9 x 14.6 inches or 55.6 x 37.1 cm for very good quality, and 18.2 ten 12.ii inches or 46.3 10 30.ix cm for excellent quality prints.
The 7D Mark 2 has
on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.
The Canon EOS 5D Marking Iii has a native
from ISO 100 to ISO 25600, which tin exist extended to ISO l-102400. The corresponding ISO settings for the Catechism EOS 7D Mark 2 are ISO 100 to ISO 16000, with the possibility to increment the ISO range to 100-51200.
Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors. Both cameras apply a
for capturing RGB colors on a square grid of photosensors. This organization is found in most digital cameras.
For many cameras, data on sensor performance has been reported past DXO Marker. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well as sub-scores for depression-light sensitivity (“DXO Sports”), dynamic range (“DXO Mural”), and color depth (“DXO Portrait”). Of the ii cameras nether review, the 5D Marker 3 provides
substantially college paradigm quality
than the 7D Marking II, with an overall score that is 11 points higher. This advantage is based on 1.6 $.25 college colour depth, 0.i EV of lower dynamic range, and 1.i stops in additional low lite sensitivity. The table beneath summarizes the concrete sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them beyond a set of similar cameras.
|i.||Catechism 5D Mark Iii||Full Frame||22.i||5760||3840||1080/30p||24.0||11.7||2293||81|
|2.||Catechism 7D Two||APS-C||20.0||5472||3648||1080/60p||22.4||11.eight||1082||70|
|3.||Catechism 6D Mark 2||Full Frame||26.0||6240||4160||1080/60p||24.4||11.nine||2862||85|
|iv.||Catechism 1D X Mark Two||Full Frame||xx.0||5472||3648||4K/60p||24.1||thirteen.v||3207||88|
|v.||Catechism 5D Mark Four||Full Frame||xxx.1||6720||4480||4K/30p||24.8||13.half-dozen||2995||91|
|seven.||Canon 5DS||Full Frame||l.3||8688||5792||1080/30p||24.7||12.iv||2381||87|
|eight.||Canon 5DS R||Full Frame||fifty.iii||8688||5792||1080/30p||24.6||12.4||2308||86|
|ten.||Canon 6D||Full Frame||xx.0||5472||3648||1080/30p||23.8||12.1||2340||82|
|13.||Canon 5D Mark Ii||Full Frame||21.0||5616||3744||1080/30p||23.seven||xi.9||1815||79|
|xiv.||Canon 5D||Full Frame||12.seven||4368||2912||none||22.nine||11.1||1368||71|
Many mod cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also
record movies. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the 7D Mark II provides a faster frame rate than the 5D Mark Iii. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the 5D Mark III is limited to 1080/30p.
Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and practice differ across a range of features. The 5D Mark III and the 7D Marking Ii are similar in the sense that both have an
optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a articulate image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same field of view (100%), only the viewfinder of the 5D Marker III has a higher magnification than the i of the 7D Mark II (0.71x vs 0.63x), so that the size of the image transmitted appears closer to the size seen with the naked human eye. The side by side table lists some of the other core features of the Canon 5D Mark 3 and Canon 7D Ii along with similar information for a choice of comparators.
|1.||Canon 5D Marking Three||optical||Y||three.2 / 1040||stock-still||n||i/8000s||6.0/s||n||due north|
|two.||Canon 7D II||optical||Y||three.0 / 1040||fixed||n||1/8000s||10.0/s||Y||due north|
|3.||Canon 6D Marker II||optical||Y||3.0 / 1040||swivel||Y||1/4000s||6.v/s||n||north|
|4.||Canon 1D Ten Mark II||optical||Y||3.2 / 1620||fixed||Y||1/8000s||16.0/s||due north||due north|
|5.||Canon 5D Mark IV||optical||Y||3.2 / 1620||fixed||Y||1/8000s||7.0/south||northward||n|
|6.||Canon 80D||optical||Y||iii.0 / 1040||swivel||Y||1/8000s||7.0/s||Y||north|
|7.||Canon 5DS||optical||Y||3.2 / 1040||stock-still||n||1/8000s||five.0/s||northward||n|
|8.||Canon 5DS R||optical||Y||3.2 / 1040||fixed||n||ane/8000s||v.0/s||north||due north|
|9.||Catechism 70D||optical||Y||three.0 / 1040||hinge||Y||1/8000s||7.0/s||Y||due north|
|10.||Canon 6D||optical||Y||3.0 / 1040||fixed||n||ane/4000s||iv.five/s||due north||due north|
|11.||Canon 60D||optical||Y||3.0 / 1040||swivel||due north||1/8000s||five.iii/due south||Y||northward|
|12.||Canon 7D||optical||Y||3.0 / 920||fixed||due north||1/8000s||8.0/s||Y||n|
|13.||Catechism 5D Mark II||optical||Y||three.0 / 920||fixed||due north||one/8000s||iii.9/s||due north||due north|
|14.||Catechism 5D||optical||Y||2.5 / 230||fixed||n||1/8000s||three.0/s||north||n|
|Notes: *) Information refers to the mechanical shutter, unless the photographic camera merely has an electronic i.|
One divergence between the cameras concerns the
presence of an on-board flash. The 7D Mark II has one, while the 5D Mark 3 does not. While the built-in flash of the 7D Mark II is not very powerful, it can at times be useful every bit a make full-in light.
The Catechism 7D II has an
intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rising, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the 5D Mark III and the 7D Marking Two write their files to
Compact Wink or SDXC cards. Both cameras feature
dual card slots, which can be very useful in example a memory card fails. The 7D Marker II supports UHS-I cards (Ultra High Speed data transfer of upward to 104 MB/south), while the 5D Mark Three cannot take advantage of Ultra High Speed SD cards.
For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its surround can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 5D Mark Iii and Canon EOS 7D Mark II and, in item, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for
accessory control and data transfer.
Mic / Speaker
|i.||Canon 5D Mark Iii||Y||mono / mono||Y||Y||mini||2.0||–||–||–|
|two.||Canon 7D II||Y||stereo / mono||Y||Y||mini||3.0||–||–||–|
|3.||Catechism 6D Marking 2||Y||stereo / mono||Y||–||mini||2.0||Y||Y||Y|
|4.||Canon 1D X Mark II||Y||mono / mono||Y||Y||mini||3.0||–||–||–|
|5.||Canon 5D Mark 4||Y||mono / mono||Y||Y||mini||3.0||Y||Y||–|
|half dozen.||Catechism 80D||Y||stereo / mono||Y||Y||mini||2.0||Y||Y||–|
|seven.||Canon 5DS||Y||mono / mono||Y||–||mini||3.0||–||–||–|
|8.||Canon 5DS R||Y||mono / mono||Y||–||mini||iii.0||–||–||–|
|9.||Canon 70D||Y||stereo / mono||Y||–||mini||2.0||Y||–||–|
|10.||Canon 6D||Y||mono / mono||Y||–||mini||two.0||Y||–||–|
|11.||Catechism 60D||Y||mono / mono||Y||–||mini||2.0||–||–||–|
|12.||Canon 7D||Y||mono /–||Y||–||mini||2.0||–||–||–|
|xiii.||Canon 5D Mark Ii||Y||mono / mono||Y||–||mini||two.0||–||–||–|
|14.||Canon 5D||Y||– /–||–||–||–||ii.0||–||–||–|
Both cameras feature a
PC Sync terminal
to control professional strobe lights, which volition be appreciated past studio photographers.
Travel and mural photographers will discover it useful that the 7D Marker II has an
sensor and tin can record GPS coordinates in its EXIF data.
Both the 5D Mark III and the 7D Mark II
accept been discontinued, just tin regularly be establish used on ebay. The 5D Marking Iii was replaced by the Canon 5D Mark IV, while the 7D Mark 2 does not accept a direct successor. Farther information on the features and operation of the 5D Mark 3 and 7D Marking Ii can be found, respectively, in the Canon 5D Mark Three Manual (gratuitous pdf) or the online Catechism 7D II Manual.
So what is the bottom line? Is the Canon 5D Mark III improve than the Canon 7D Ii or vice versa? Below is a summary of the
of each of the two contestants.
Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS 5D Mark Three:
More than detail:
Offers more megapixels (22.1 vs 20MP) with a v% higher linear resolution.
Ameliorate image quality:
Scores substantially higher (11 points) in the DXO overall assessment.
Generates images with noticeably better colors (one.6 $.25 more color depth).
Better low-light sensitivity:
Requires less calorie-free for adept images (one.one stops ISO advantage).
Larger viewfinder epitome:
Features a viewfinder with a higher magnification (0.71x vs 0.63x).
Has a bigger rear LCD (3.2″ vs 3.0″) for image review and settings control.
Tin can take more shots (950 versus 670) on a unmarried bombardment accuse.
More than heavily discounted:
Has been available for much longer (launched in March 2012).
Advantages of the Catechism EOS 7D Marking II:
Provides higher picture framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
Amend live-view autofocus:
Features on-sensor phase-detection for more than confident autofocus.
Shoots at higher frequency (ten vs 6 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
Easier time-lapse photography:
Has an intervalometer built-in for depression frequency shooting.
Easier fill up-in:
Has a small integrated flash to brighten shadows of backlit subjects.
Features an internal GPS sensor to log localization data.
Faster data transfer:
Supports a more than avant-garde USB protocol (iii.0 vs 2.0).
Faster buffer clearing:
Has an SD card interface that supports the UHS-I standard.
Was introduced into a lower priced category (49 percent cheaper at launch).
Reflects 2 years and vi months of technical progress since the 5D Mark III launch.
If the number of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken every bit a guide, the 7D Mark Two emerges as the winner of the match-up (10 : eight points). Nonetheless, the
relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary
according to personal preferences and needs, so that yous might like to utilise corresponding weights to the particular features before making a determination on a new camera. A professional person wildlife lensman will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in compages has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the conclusion which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal 1.
5D Mark III08
x 7D Mark Ii
How well-nigh other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 5D Mark Three and the Canon 7D Ii place the cameras among the
superlative in their class? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Photographic camera listing whether the two cameras rank amongst the foam of the crop.
In whatsoever example, while the specs-based evaluation of cameras can exist instructive in revealing their potential as photographic tools, it remains partial and cannot reveal, for example, the shooting feel and imaging performance when
with the 5D Mark Iii or the 7D Marker Two. User reviews, such as those establish at amazon, can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased.
This is why
hands-on reviews by experts
are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the photographic camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], digitalcameraworld [DCW], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As tin exist seen, the professional reviewers concur in many cases on the quality of dissimilar cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the before betoken that a camera conclusion is often a very personal option.
| Photographic camera
|1.||Canon 5D Mark 3||..||+ +||..||82/100||4.v/five||4.5/v||Mar 2012||three,499||ebay.com|
|2.||Canon 7D 2||four.5/v||+||3.5/5||84/100||4/5||4.v/5||Sep 2014||1,799||ebay.com|
|iii.||Canon 6D Mark II||4/v||+||4/5||fourscore/100||4.5/5||4/5||Jun 2017||1,999||amazon.com|
|four.||Canon 1D X Marking II||..||..||4.5/five||89/100||four.5/5||four.5/five||Feb 2016||5,999||ebay.com|
|5.||Catechism 5D Mark IV||4.v/5||+ +||4/5||87/100||four.5/five||4.5/5||Aug 2016||iii,499||amazon.com|
|6.||Canon 80D||4/5||+ +||4.5/five||84/100||4.5/5||4.5/five||Feb 2016||1,199||ebay.com|
|7.||Canon 5DS||..||+||..||83/100||4.5/v||four.5/5||February 2015||3,699||amazon.com|
|8.||Canon 5DS R||5/five||+||..||83/100||5/5||4.five/5||Feb 2015||3,699||amazon.com|
|nine.||Canon 70D||5/5||+ +||..||83/100||4.5/five||5/v||Jul 2013||i,199||ebay.com|
|ten.||Canon 6D||5/5||+ +||..||83/100||iv.5/5||4.v/5||Sep 2012||2,099||ebay.com|
|11.||Canon 60D||5/5||+||..||79/100||4/5||four.5/five||Aug 2010||ane,399||ebay.com|
|12.||Canon 7D||five/5||+ +||..||84/100||4.5/five||4.5/v||Sep 2009||1,699||ebay.com|
|13.||Canon 5D Mark Two||4/five||91/100||..||79/100||4/5||..||Sep 2008||3,499||ebay.com|
|xiv.||Canon 5D||..||88/100||..||+ +||o||..||Aug 2005||3,299||ebay.com|
|Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.|
The review scores listed above should be
treated with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch engagement and the launch cost of the photographic camera, and comparisons of ratings amid very dissimilar cameras or beyond long time periods have little significant. Likewise, kindly note that some of the listed sites have over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.
Other photographic camera comparisons
Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to run into a different
side-by-side photographic camera review, but make a corresponding choice in the search boxes beneath. Equally an culling, you tin can also directly jump to whatever one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.
- Canon 5D Marker III vs Fujifilm GFX 100S
- Canon 5D Mark 3 vs Nikon 1 V2
- Canon 5D Marking III vs Panasonic FZ200
- Canon 5D Mark III vs Panasonic GF6
- Canon 5D Marker 3 vs Panasonic S1R
- Canon 5D Mark 3 vs Panasonic ZS70
- Canon 7D II vs Catechism R6
- Canon 7D Ii vs Contax N Digital
- Canon 7D Two vs Leica M Typ 262
- Catechism 7D II vs Olympus E-PL8
- Canon 7D II vs Panasonic G2
- Canon 7D 2 vs Panasonic GH3
Specifications: Canon 5D Mark Three vs Canon 7D Two
Below is a side-past-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.
|Camera Model||Canon 5D Mark III||Canon 7D Two|
|Camera Type||Digital single lens reflex||Digital single lens reflex|
|Camera Lens||Canon EF mount lenses||Canon EF mount lenses|
|Launch Date||March 2012||September 2014|
|Launch Price||USD 3,499||USD 1,799|
|Sensor Specs||Catechism 5D Mark Three||Canon 7D II|
|Sensor Applied science||CMOS||CMOS|
|Sensor Format||Total Frame Sensor||APS-C Sensor|
|Sensor Size||36.0 ten 24.0 mm||22.four ten 15.0 mm|
|Sensor Area||864 mm2||336 mm2|
|Sensor Diagonal||43.three mm||27 mm|
|Sensor Resolution||22.1 Megapixels||20 Megapixels|
|Epitome Resolution||5760 x 3840 pixels||5472 x 3648 pixels|
|Pixel Pitch||6.25 μm||four.10 μm|
|Pixel Density||2.56 MP/cmtwo||5.94 MP/cm2|
|Moiré control||Anti-Alias filter||Anti-Alias filter|
|Picture Capability||1080/30p Video||1080/60p Video|
|ISO Setting||100 – 25,600 ISO||100 – 16,000 ISO|
|ISO Boost||50 – 102,400 ISO||100 – 51,200 ISO|
|Image Processor||DIGIC 5+||DIGIC 6 (Dual)|
|DXO Sensor Quality (score)||81||70|
|DXO Color Depth (bits)||24.0||22.iv|
|DXO Dynamic Range (EV)||11.7||11.8|
|DXO Low Light (ISO)||2293||1082|
|Screen Specs||Canon 5D Mark Three||Catechism 7D II|
|Viewfinder Type||Optical viewfinder||Optical viewfinder|
|Viewfinder Field of View||100%||100%|
|Top-Level Screen||Control Console||Control Panel|
|LCD Framing||Live View||Alive View|
|Rear LCD Size||three.2inch||three.0inch|
|LCD Resolution||1040k dots||1040k dots|
|LCD Attachment||Fixed screen||Fixed screen|
|Shooting Specs||Canon 5D Mark 3||Canon 7D II|
|Focus System||Phase-find AF||Phase-find AF|
|Continuous Shooting||half-dozen shutter flaps/southward||10 shutter flaps/s|
|Shutter Life Expectancy||150 000 actuations||200 000 actuations|
|Fourth dimension-Lapse Photography||no Intervalometer||Intervalometer built-in|
|Fill Flash||no On-Board Wink||Congenital-in Flash|
|Storage Medium||CF or SDXC cards||CF or SDXC cards|
|2d Storage Selection||Dual card slots||Dual card slots|
|UHS card support||no||UHS-I|
|Connectivity Specs||Canon 5D Mark III||Canon 7D Two|
|Studio Flash||PC Sync socket||PC Sync socket|
|USB Connector||USB 2.0||USB 3.0|
|HDMI Port||mini HDMI||mini HDMI|
|Microphone Port||External MIC port||External MIC port|
|Headphone Socket||Headphone port||Headphone port|
|Wifi Support||no Wifi||no Wifi|
|Geotagging||no internal GPS||GPS congenital-in|
|Body Specs||Canon 5D Mark III||Catechism 7D II|
|Ecology Sealing||Weathersealed body||Weathersealed trunk|
|Bombardment Life (CIPA)||950 shots per accuse||670 shots per charge|
152 ten 116 x 76 mm
(half-dozen.0 10 4.6 ten 3.0 in)
149 x 112 x 78 mm
(five.9 x 4.4 x 3.1 in)
|Camera Weight||950 thou (33.5 oz)||910 grand (32.1 oz)|
Did you lot notice an error on this page? If so, please get in affect, and then that we tin correct the information.