While information technology may be a petty unfair to present this equally a “versus,” the introduction of the 5DS/5DS R and 5D Marker 4 over the by couple of years has fabricated the camera-buying decision a little more complicated. Photographers, especially, may exist curious about whether they should choice up the specialized high-res selection, so decide which of those to purchase, or to selection up the latest iteration of Catechism’s legendary 5D lineup. Hopefully this quick run-through will help you out.
Megapixels and Resolution
This is the easiest place to get started. The 5DS and 5DS R are equipped with 50.6MP full-frame CMOS sensors, while the 5D Mark IV has a 30.4MP full-frame CMOS sensor. The 5DS cameras win hands here. If your piece of work relies on having the most item and resolution possible, such equally with product, macro, or general studio piece of work, the 5DS R is the obvious choice, since its low pass filter counterfoil issue guarantees the maximum resolution. At present, if you shoot a lot of fine patterns, such equally wearable, you may desire to opt for the 5DS, which retains the OLPF effect for reducing and eliminating moiré and aliasing.
This is another no contest category, but the other way around this time—the 5D Marking Iv’south DCI 4K video and various other settings and capabilities accident abroad the basic Full HD 1080p30 selection of the 5DS. The Marking Iv’due south Dual Pixel CMOS AF system is awesome for video. If you lot are a hybrid videographer/still photographer, the 5D Mark IV is a no-brainer.
This is more than a question of need rather than want. If you consistently find yourself bumping up the ISO, such every bit in a dim wedding venue, concert, or but out on the street, the 5D Mark Four’south lower-resolution sensor as well brings with it a much improved native sensitivity range of up to ISO 32000, which tin can be expanded to ISO 102400. The 5DS, on the other hand, has a comparatively low native range of upward to ISO 6400, which can just expand to ISO 12800. Just put, the 5D Mark 4 is a documentarian’south or street photographer’s camera (and other similar specialties), while the 5DS remains firmly planted in the mural photographer, studio shooter, or strobist’s toolkit.
Speed for Sports or Wildlife Photography
This is a more surprising comparison, since you would expect the lower-resolution Mark IV to really take it without question, merely the 5DS puts up a keen fight. Both manage to pack in a 61-point High Density Reticular AF system, which should practise a wonderful job on a plethora of tough subjects, but they begin to dissever on continuous shooting speeds. The Marker 4 takes the atomic number 82, with 7 fps, and the 5DS is just behind with v fps. The 5DS’s impressive speed is likely due to having Dual DIGIC half dozen processors, compared to the Mark Iv’s single DIGIC 6+. For more applied concerns, the 5DS offers a keen trick—the power to crop to either 1.3x or one.6x, giving shooters a fleck of extra “attain” without requiring extra cropping in post. But, with the Marking Iv’s faster speed, improved low-light performance, and smaller file sizes, most sports photographers will choose the Mark Iv instead.
The 5D Mark IV has a leg upwardly here, likely due to its more contempo release appointment and a further refinement of features. Information technology gains touch capabilities on its rear LCD, as well equally a dedicated AF Expanse Select push. These ii additions may seem minor, merely when you are looking at ii extremely similar camera designs, the smaller things like this make all the difference. Realistically, other reasons should button you to pick one or the other besides an extra push or touchscreen.
If you had your mind simply most made upward when information technology came to these cameras, in that location are a few more fancy features and settings that could make things somewhat hard if yous were on the fence 1 mode or the other. The 5DS/5DS R doesn’t accept as many unique options, and so let’s outset there. This includes a Fine Detail Picture Style and a Mirror Vibration Command organization and Time Release Lag setting for eliminating camera shake. The Mark Iv takes the cake when it comes to fancy features, with the newfangled Dual Pixel RAW technology, born GPS and Wi-Fi with NFC, and Digital Lens Optimizer engineering for JPEGs. This is all going to come downwards to personal preference.
What well-nigh the 5D Mark III?
In an interesting move, Catechism did not discontinue the 5D Mark III when they announced the Mark Four. This means that users looking to pick up a 5D-series camera do have one other choice bachelor. The Marker III is an older model at this point, simply still an incredibly good camera. It sports the lowest resolution on the list at only 22.3MP, but these days most shooters don’t actually need much more than that. It isn’t quite as sensitive as the Mark Iv, only its native sensitivity still reaches ISO 25600, which beats out the 5DS by a practiced margin. Too, its 61-point High Density Reticular AF organization is quite skilful, but it just doesn’t take as wide coverage as the newer models. Altogether, if you are looking to bound into full-frame at a lower price and don’t demand the added video features of the Marking Four and don’t need the sometimes too-loftier resolution of the 5DS/5DS R, the Marker 3 is a nifty choice.
Which one of these canon cameras is right for you? Tell us in the Comments section, below.