The Nikon Z6 2 and Canon Eos R6 are two full frame mirrorless cameras that pack a lot of features. They certainly share a few similarities, including in-trunk paradigm stabilisation, hybrid autofocus and 4K 60p video, but in one case we analyse the specifications a fleck closer, there are small yet important differences we need to highlight.
Ethics statement: the post-obit is based on official specs well-nigh the Z6 Ii and our personal experience with the Z6 and R6. Nosotros were not asked to write annihilation virtually these products, nor were nosotros provided with any sort of bounty. Within the article, in that location are chapter links. If you purchase something after clicking one of these links, we volition receive a small commission. To know more than about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Thanks!
1. Paradigm sensor
The Nikon Z6 II features a 24.5MP sensor, whereas the R6 has about 20% less resolution at 20.1MP. Both cameras have a low pass filter, whereas but the Nikon sensor has a BSI design (dorsum-illuminated). The latter, on paper, provides amend calorie-free gathering which can amend the quality when it comes to dynamic range and high ISO.
Concerning ISO, the R6 has a wider normal range in photograph mode, but a smaller one in video mode. The extended values are the same.
With the Z6 II, you can shoot in 12-flake or 14-fleck RAW (compressed, lossless compressed or uncompressed), or JPG.
The R6 has two RAW options (14-chip uncompressed or Compressed RAW), JPG and HEIFF. The latter is a 10-chip HDR format that offers more dynamic range than the standard JPG (which is viii-chip). You can see an case below. Keep in heed that Heiff compatibility with pop photo editor software programs is notwithstanding express.
The Z6 II has the same sensor as the original Z6, which means it delivers excellent dynamic range and high ISO performance (on par with the popular Sony A7 Iii). The R6, which nosotros take as well tested in-depth, is perhaps slightly amend but I’m talking about very small differences here.
2. Paradigm stabilisation
Both cameras have image stabilisation, with a 5-axis mechanism that moves the sensor to compensate for camera shakes. Information technology works in photograph and video way.
The Z6 Ii has a rating of 5 stops (CIPA), which is the average y’all observe on many mirrorless cameras including the Sony A7 series. Information technology is the same mechanism plant on the original Z6, and allows you to take images paw-held around 1s if yous accept the patience to find a comfy position and take multiple shots to make certain one is perfectly precipitous.
The R6 mechanism has an impressive rating of viii stops of compensation, however note that this loftier rating is non accomplished with every lens. (More than details in our R5 vs R6 comparison.) In our tests, we were able to push the R6 to a shutter speed of ii seconds mitt-held, although keep in heed that the keeper rate is non perfect (about 30%).
Both systems work in conjunction with optical stabilisation when a compatible stabilised lens is attached. The R6 uses three axes on the sensor (roll, x and y) and the remaining two axes on the lens (pitch and yaw). The Z6 Ii uses one axis on the sensor (whorl) and two on the lens.
In video mode, both cameras offer an extra setting: digital stabilisation, which makes the footage more stable but reduces the field of view a petty as a result. The R6 has ii levels (Enable and Enhanced) with the 2nd cropping the sensor more.
3. Autofocus organization and burst speed
Both cameras characteristic on-sensor phase detection AF points. The Z6 has 273 points that comprehend xc% of the sensor area.
The R6 uses the Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology (version II) that Canon has been developing for a long fourth dimension now. At that place is 100% sensor coverage when using the Tracking AF method. With other focus areas, it’s 100% height and ninety% width. If you select the Unmarried AF method, you have a whopping half dozen,072 points!
You lot will detect face and middle detection on both cameras, and they can likewise recognise and focus on the optics of animals cheers to deep learning technology. However, that of the Z6 II is limited to cats and dogs. The Canon can also detect bodies (man or animals).
Apropos the sensitivity in low light, the Z6 2 has an advantage if you lot activate the Low Light AF mode, which is slower simply tin focus in darker conditions.
- Z6 II: -4.5Ev at F2 (or -6Ev with Low Light AF)
- R6: -6.5Ev with a F1.2 lens (or -five at f/ii)
The R6 proved an excellent performer in our tests. Except for a few occasional mis-focusing behaviours when a person wears a hat, it gave u.s.a. a nearly perfect hit rate for face / centre detection (stills and video) and an excellent score for birds in flight, existence outranked just by the Sony A9 series.
The Z6 Two received some improvements (in comparison to the Z6 mark I) that I have yet to test, merely it’s worth pointing out that the original model did very well in my birds test, and I as well found Heart AF reliable, although not as fast as the Canon system. If anything, the Z6 Ii should exist closer to the performance of the R6.
The Z6 II tin can shoot in continuous fashion upwards to 14fps, although at this speed the bit depth for RAW files is limited to 12-bit. If you desire 14-bit, the speed is slightly lower at 12fps.
The R6 goes up to 12fps, or upwards to 20fps when you select the electronic shutter. All these speeds are available with AF and AE tracking on both cameras.
The buffer retention is larger for the Canon. Whereas the Z6 2 can record 124 RAW or 200 JPGs at 14fps before slowing down, the R6 tin can practice 240 RAW files or thousand JPGs at 12fps.
Both cameras tin record 4K video up to 60p, whereas in Full Hd they can get up to 120p.
The Z6 Ii uses the unabridged width of the sensor and over-samples from a 6K region upward to 30p. At 50 and 60p however, a ane.5x ingather is applied to the sensor.
The R6 applies a pocket-size ingather of 1.07x at all frames rates in 4K, significant that your field of view doesn’t alter drastically when recording at 50fps or 60fps.
Recording in 10-chip 4:2:2 is available internally on the R6, whereas you demand an external recorder continued to the HDMI port for the Z6 II. The Nikon too has a RAW video pick in 12-bit with the same connection, but yous need a paid upgrade at a Nikon center to enable it.
The R6 too has a higher bitrate. Here is a recap of all the main video specs.
|Video specs.||Z6 II||R6|
|4K 50/60p||1.5x crop||1.07x crop|
|4K 24 to 30p||No crop||1.07x crop|
|Total HD||No ingather||No ingather|
|4K 24 to 30p
|Full Hard disk 120p
|Full Hd 50/60p
|8-bit 4:2:0||8-bit four:2:0
|x-scrap 4:2:2||ten-bit 4:2:2|
|Log / HDR
|Log / HDR
Concerning sound, both cameras offer a 3.5mm microphone input and headphone output.
The R6 delivers excellent video quality with fast and reliable autofocus and a good range of formats to choose from. The only limit is overheating, which is non as dramatic as it was one time believed (also thanks to firmware updates) but it can definitely wearisome down your production twenty-four hours.
I haven’t heard reports of overheating issues with the Z6 2 (nor have I experienced any with the original Z6), but it’s a shame that the about avant-garde settings (N-Log, 10-bit recording) are express to the HDMI output.
The Canon model is slightly bigger and has a larger front end grip, whereas the Nikon is a bit taller. The two remain very similar overall when information technology comes to dimensions and weight. They are grit and moisture resistant, and feature a magnesium blend frame.
: 134 ten 100.5 x 69.5mm, 705g
- R6: 138 10 97.v 10 88.4mm, 680g
I similar the design and ergonomics of both cameras, and so it is difficult for me to pick a favourite.
The R6 has more than custom buttons which is nice if you similar to personalise your camera equally much as possible, although you tin’t alter the Quick menu, unlike with the Nikon.
I detect the photo/video way switch on the rear of the Z6 II very handy, as well as the position of the ii Function buttons at the front. The Nikon too has a small LCD screen on peak to bank check the basic settings speedily.
When it comes to concrete connections, both cameras have a USB Type C port and HDMI output. For the latter, Nikon has called the Mini size (Type C) whereas Canon uses the Micro size (Type D).
6. Viewfinder and rear monitor
The Z6 2 and R6 have a very similar electronic viewfinder with 3.69M dots and a 23mm eyepoint. The EVF on the Canon has a higher frame rate (120fps vs 60fps) whereas the magnification is higher on the Nikon model (0.8x vs 0.76x).
As for the rear LCD screen, the ane on the Z6 II has more resolution (ii.1M vs 1.61M dots) and is slightly larger (3.2 vs 3.fifteen-in). The articulation machinery is unlike however: that of the Nikon tilts upwards and down, without whatsoever selfie/v-log possibility. On the Canon, y’all can flip the screen to the side and rotate information technology 180˚.
Both monitors are touch sensitive and allow you to perform a variety of operations, from taking a pic to navigating the entire menu.
seven. Retentiveness card
The Z6 Ii has duel memory card slots but you can’t use the same blazon of card in both slots. The first takes CFexpress or XQD cards, whereas the 2nd takes UHS-II SD cards.
The R6 has ii slots compatible with SD cards (UHS-II).
The XQD / CF Express cards are thicker and faster than SD cards, but they are likewise more expensive.
The Nikon comes with the LP-E6NH and has a rating of 410 frames (LCD) or 390 frames (EVF) with a single charge. These are CIPA standards so they are always lower than the numbers you can achieve in real earth employ.
The R6 does a bit better, especially if you use the LCD with a rating of 510 shots (it’s 380 with the EVF).
Y’all’ll detect an optional battery grip for both products, and you can also charge them or power them via USB. Continue in mind that the R6 power delivery may not work with every powerbank (it needs to be a high current model).
Nikon and Catechism started their mirrorless full frame line-upward at the same time in 2018. Three years later, they have released a good selection that includes F2.8 zooms amidst other things.
Catechism has released 23 lenses and two extenders then far. In comparing to Nikon, it has more telephoto lenses for photographers on a upkeep or those wanting the ultimate performance. The brand has also concentrated on compactness, reducing the dimensions of lenses such as the seventy-200mm F4 or 70-200mm F2.8. It also has some unique lenses like the 28-70mm F2. Lately, more affordable lenses have surfaced which is something that was lacking before.
Nikon has released xx lenses and ii teleconverters. More are on the mode, including 100-400mm and 200-600mm telephoto lenses. There is a good number of 1.8 primes, and some unique offerings such equally the super fast (and super expensive) Noct 58mm f/0.95 (manual focus but). Lately, the visitor has also released more than affordable and compact lenses.
With both cameras, you can expand the selection by using an adapter with DSLR lenses (Nikkor F and Canon EF), and both brands have designed their own adapter for this (Canon has three of them). The AF performance remains very good and all the other automatisms are bachelor. This is especially useful for those who want to transition from a Canon or Nikon DSLR gear up-up to a mirrorless set-up.
Nikon has also released two APS-C cameras with the Z-mount so far, the Z50 and Z fc. Canon has its own APS-C series, the EOS K, just the mount is not the aforementioned as the EOS R series, so you can’t interchange lenses between the two, unlike with Nikon.
The Z6 II can be purchased from $2000, £2000 or €2200 for the body but.
The R6 is more expensive and starts at $2500, £2400 / €2400 (body only).
Note these prices are equally of belatedly September 2021, and may vary over time.
The Nikon Z6 Two and Catechism R6 are ii very competitive full frame cameras on the marketplace today, and I admit that if I were to choose betwixt the two, I would not be able to make a conclusion apace. If we dig deeper, we find a number of differences that could lead yous towards one or the other.
The epitome quality is very similar, with the Nikon packing a few more megapixels. They have excellent autofocus operation, with perchance the R6 having a small reward thanks to features such as fauna field of study detection that is more complete in terms of the quantity of animals the camera can recognise. The Canon also has the advantage of a faster burst speed when using the electronic shutter.
The R6 has more bonny features for video, and these include 10-bit and Log bachelor for internal recording, a higher bitrate and the possibility of recording 4K 50/60p without a big sensor crop. With the Z6 II, Log and ten-chip are only available via the HDMI port, and 4K 50/60p has a 1.5x crop.
If y’all don’t mind using an external recorder, then the Nikon is the only one with a 12-chip RAW video options, equally long as you’re fine with sending the camera to Nikon’south Repair Service for a fee.
The two are dissimilar in their ain mode when information technology comes to design and ergonomics, but they both offer solutions that I really like in terms of the button layout. Another advantage of the Canon is that it uses the same type of bill of fare for both slots.
Cheque price of the Nikon Z6 Ii on
Amazon | Amazon UK | B&H Photo | eBay
Check the price of the Canon EOS R6 on:
Amazon | Amazon UK | B&H Photo | eBay