This Canon 6D vs 5D Mark 3 guide is exactly what y’all need if yous’re struggling to choose betwixt these two excellent full-frame cameras.
I’m going to tell y’all everything you should know nigh these two DSLRs – so that you tin can brand an informed decision virtually which is best for your photography.
Canon 5D Mark Three
Sturdy, reliable camera that stands the exam of time and makes for an excellent entry point into the full-frame DSLR market place.
Check Electric current Cost
The Canon 5D Mark III is the older of the two models, but don’t allow that fool y’all. Information technology packs quite a dial in terms of its build, full-frame image quality, and autofocus functioning, fifty-fifty after the better part of a decade.
But while the Canon 6D may non take quite as many megapixels or AF points, it’s notwithstanding an excellent selection for photographers looking to enter into the total-frame arena without significant bulk (or cost).
To detect all the key differences betwixt these two cameras, read on!
Canon 6D vs 5D Marking Iii | Key Differences
1. Size & Weight
The Canon EOS 6D and the Catechism EOS 5D Marker Iii are both total-frame DSLRs, only while the 5D is designed as a rugged, professional person photographic camera, Canon really managed to cut down on size and weight for the 6D.
The EOS 6D is both surprisingly small and surprisingly light. Information technology clocks in at 770 g (27 oz), nigh 200 1000 lighter than the 5D Mark III (at 950 g/33.5 oz).
And while its dimensions don’t stray far from the 5D Marking III’due south, the 6D’s build is slimmer overall: 145 x 111 x 71mm, versus 152 ten 116.four x 76.4mm.
In other words, the 6D is a few millimeters shorter, a few millimeters thinner, and offers a slightly smaller grip, making it the ameliorate option for travel photographers, street photographers, or more casual photographers who are still looking for that full-frame image quality.
At present, the EOS 5D Mark 3 isn’t Catechism’s largest DSLR, and it won’t feel
massive, even side by side to the meaty 6D. But in that location is a noticeable divergence, and it’s one that’ll matter if you do a lot of traveling, or if you work frequently with smaller lenses.
WINNER: Catechism 6D
two. Build & Handling
When it comes to build quality, both the 6D and the 5D Mark III feel quite solid, though the latter does offering a more than rugged body overall.
The 6D has weather sealing, and I’d feel comfortable taking information technology out in low-cal rain or snow (and heavier atmospheric condition with a rain comprehend). In fact, I used the 6D for years in fairly adverse conditions, and it held up just fine.
Every bit for the 5D Mark III, it feels similar a professional person body, which comes from excellent weather sealing and magnesium alloy construction.
In terms of ergonomics, both cameras fit quite nicely in the mitt. The 6D’s smaller and lighter body may experience more comfortable on long shoots, but you do get a bigger front grip on the 5D Mark Iii also every bit a dedicated joystick.
A point in favor of the 6D is its connectivity options: You go congenital-in wi-fi, as well equally built-in GPS. While wi-fi and GPS can exist achieved on the 5D, you’ll have to purchase additional equipment.
On the other paw, the 6D but has 1 card slot (SD), versus two on the 5D Marker III (ane SD, 1 CF).
For more serious shooters looking to use your camera equally a wedding photography backup, or anyone trying to break into fast-paced professional photography, this is going to exist a huge bargain – and information technology’s 1 of the reasons why the 5D Marker 3 was labeled as a “professional person” camera upon its release.
WINNER: Canon 5D Marker 3
three. Rear LCD & Optical Viewfinders
Both these cameras debuted in 2012, which means that they’re lacking more sophisticated rear LCD features (such as touch screens).
But both LCDs are quite prissy for what they are: fixed in place, but crisp and clear, adept for focusing and reviewing images alike.
Though LCD resolutions are identical, you practise become a bit more real-estate on the Canon EOS 5D Marker 3, at 3.2 inches (versus 3 inches on the EOS 6D). While this isn’t a huge difference, the bigger the screen the better, especially for anyone who frequently shoots with the LCD.
In terms of viewfinders, you get 100% coverage on the 5D Mark Iii, compared to 97% on the 6D. I very much dislike using cropped viewfinders – information technology’s too piece of cake for annoying elements to creep into the edges of the frame – but if yous’re used to using a camera with incomplete viewfinder coverage, then this may non be much of an inconvenience.
WINNER: Catechism 5D Mark 3
Take a wait at the autofocus systems on both these cameras, and you’ll immediately find some huge differences:
The Canon EOS 5D Mark Three offers 61 AF points, 41 of them cross-type. You besides become decent (though inappreciably frame-filling) autofocus coverage, which is going to significantly improve tracking and AF efficiency.
The Canon 6D, on the other manus, only packs 11 autofocus points, clustered around the center of the frame. And just one of them (the centre point) is cantankerous-type.
All in all, this makes for a decent AF performance from the 5D Marker III when using the viewfinder. While information technology’southward non on the aforementioned level equally today’s top-level bodies, y’all’re going to go fast, consistent focusing, even when working with moving subjects.
But things do irksome down significantly when working in Live View – here, you’ll have to resign yourself to some very ponderous focusing, or you’ll want to skip Alive View shooting entirely.
The 6D, on the other manus, is a poor AF performer across the board. The xi autofocus points don’t offer much in the fashion of tracking, though you can nail still subjects pretty fast (equally long as you’re okay with focus-and-recompose techniques).
So if you’re a budding sports or activity shooter, go with the 5D Mark III.
WINNER: Canon 5D Marking III
You’ll find a like story here:
A half dozen fps continuous shooting speed on the Canon EOS 5D Marker Three, compared to a four.v fps continuous shooting speed on the Canon EOS 6D.
Honestly, neither of these is nifty for sports, wildlife, or street photography – simply you lot’ll be able to brand practice with the Catechism 5D Mark III. The 6D, on the other hand, is merely too tedious for serious action shooting.
Neither buffer is ultra-impressive, but the 5D has a slight edge here, besides: 18 RAW photos or 16270 JPEGs, versus 17 RAW photos or 1250 JPEGs on the Catechism 6D.
WINNER: Catechism 5D Mark III
vi. Epitome Quality
The Canon EOS 5D Marker Three and the Canon EOS 6D are both total-frame cameras, which means that you can look generally strong high-ISO operation across the lath from both bodies.
While I’d give the Canon 6D a slight edge in terms of high-ISO racket performance, it’due south a close phone call. And I can really just tell the deviation between RAW files when zoomed in to 100%.
On the 5D Marker Iii, noise starts to pitter-patter in at around ISO 1600, becoming more credible at ISO 3200 and becoming unusable around ISO 12800 (though the latter judgment depends heavily on your intentions).
The 6D is similar, though it shows less noise at ISO 1600. I’d feel comfy pushing ISO to 6400, only after that things kickoff to look a scrap iffy.
Note that the 6D does have a slightly smaller pixel count, which contributes to this slight difference in racket: 20 megapixels versus 22.3 megapixels.
But while this resolution difference matters slightly in terms of image quality, yous’re non going to observe much in terms of increased cropping capabilities from the 5D Marker 3; two megapixels but isn’t going to get you much of a boost.
In terms of dynamic range, both these cameras are pretty disappointing, offering about 12 stops at a maximum (11.7 on the 5D Marking III, 12.1 on the 6D). Canon isn’t the best manufacturer when it comes to DR, merely a number of its more recent bodies tin beat the 6D or the 5D Marker Iii, including the 5D Mark Four and the Canon EOS R.
To sum upwardly:
If you’re a frequent low-light shooter, both of these cameras are going to be more than adequate. The 6D is better by a hair, but you may non notice a difference in practice.
In terms of dynamic range and megapixels, differences are too subtle to exist significant, with the Canon 5D Mark Iii slightly ahead on resolution and slightly behind on dynamic range.
WINNER: Canon 6D
If you’re looking to shoot video along with stills, so both of these cameras are going to exist pretty equal – and far from impressive.
The Canon 6D and the Canon 5D Mark III both offer 1080p shooting at 30 frames per second. This isn’t up to current standards, where many cameras offer 4K/30p shooting.
And even older DSLRs tend to feature at least full HD at 60p.
You do get a microphone jack on both cameras, though only the 5D Mark Three packs a headphone port.
While you can record Hd video on either ane of these models, in that location are plenty of other options on the market place that volition let for far better video (and at a decent cost, too).
You lot’re going to struggle to find either of these cameras new – but used, they’re both available for deal prices.
And that is why they’re both great starting time full-frame options for enthusiasts.
The 6D is slightly cheaper than the 5D Mark III, at around Usa$500-$550. Simply the 5D Mark 3 is merely U.s.a.$800-$850 or then, which is an fantabulous price for a camera offering so many excellent features.
(The original retail prices, by the way, reflected this difference. You could grab the 5D Marking III for effectually $2,800, compared to $2,099 for the 6D.)
In many ways, the 5D Mark Three
the better photographic camera.
And then the real question is:
Are y’all willing to pay an extra $300 for it?
WINNER: Catechism 6D
Catechism 6D vs 5D Mark 3 | Concluding Words
The Catechism EOS 6D and the Catechism EOS 5D Mark Three are both first-class cameras, fifty-fifty if they have been succeeded by more powerful (admitting pricier) options.
Remember that while both bodies offering comparable image quality, the 5D Mark Iii packs significantly meliorate autofocus, slightly ameliorate build quality, a 100%-coverage viewfinder, and dual card slots.
On the other hand, the 6D is smaller and lighter, plus information technology offers built-in wi-fi and GPS.
Ultimately, the pick is yours – and will depend on what you lot want to shoot. If you’re thinking of dabbling in whatever action-related photography (street, sports, wildlife, bird) then become with the 5D Mark Iii. Information technology’s worth the actress money.
If yous’re planning on shooting whatsoever fast-paced events where redundancy is important, then you should as well go with the 5D Mark III. The dual carte du jour slots are going to be fundamental.
But if you want great image quality in a smaller package and are looking for a great camera for travel photography, casual everyday photography, or even mural photography – then the 6D is a great purchase.
Canon 5D Mark III
Sturdy, reliable photographic camera that stands the exam of time and makes for an excellent entry point into the full-frame DSLR market.
Bank check Current Price