This Canon 6D vs 5D Mark Iii guide is exactly what you demand if you lot’re struggling to choose between these two first-class full-frame cameras.
I’thou going to tell you everything yous should know about these two DSLRs – then that you lot tin make an informed decision about which is all-time for your photography.
Canon 5D Mark III
Sturdy, reliable camera that stands the test of time and makes for an excellent entry betoken into the total-frame DSLR market.
Check Current Price
The Catechism 5D Mark 3 is the older of the two models, but don’t let that fool you. Information technology packs quite a punch in terms of its build, full-frame image quality, and autofocus performance, fifty-fifty after the improve part of a decade.
Merely while the Canon 6D may not accept quite as many megapixels or AF points, it’due south all the same an excellent choice for photographers looking to enter into the full-frame loonshit without significant majority (or toll).
To discover all the fundamental differences betwixt these 2 cameras, read on!
Canon 6D vs 5D Mark III | Fundamental Differences
1. Size & Weight
The Canon EOS 6D and the Canon EOS 5D Marking Three are both full-frame DSLRs, but while the 5D is designed as a rugged, professional person camera, Canon actually managed to cut downwards on size and weight for the 6D.
The EOS 6D is both surprisingly small and surprisingly light. It clocks in at 770 g (27 oz), nigh 200 g lighter than the 5D Marker 3 (at 950 thousand/33.5 oz).
And while its dimensions don’t stray far from the 5D Marker 3’s, the 6D’s build is slimmer overall: 145 x 111 x 71mm, versus 152 x 116.four x 76.4mm.
In other words, the 6D is a few millimeters shorter, a few millimeters thinner, and offers a slightly smaller grip, making it the better option for travel photographers, street photographers, or more coincidental photographers who are still looking for that full-frame image quality.
Now, the EOS 5D Marking Iii isn’t Canon’due south largest DSLR, and information technology won’t feel
massive, even next to the compact 6D. But at that place is a noticeable departure, and information technology’s i that’ll matter if yous do a lot of traveling, or if you work frequently with smaller lenses.
WINNER: Catechism 6D
2. Build & Handling
When it comes to build quality, both the 6D and the 5D Mark Three feel quite solid, though the latter does offering a more rugged body overall.
The 6D has weather sealing, and I’d feel comfy taking it out in light rain or snow (and heavier weather with a rain embrace). In fact, I used the 6D for years in fairly adverse conditions, and it held up only fine.
As for the 5D Marking Iii, it feels like a professional body, which comes from fantabulous atmospheric condition sealing and magnesium alloy construction.
In terms of ergonomics, both cameras fit quite nicely in the hand. The 6D’s smaller and lighter body may feel more comfortable on long shoots, merely yous exercise get a bigger front end grip on the 5D Mark Iii every bit well as a dedicated joystick.
A point in favor of the 6D is its connectivity options: Y’all get built-in wi-fi, as well as built-in GPS. While wi-fi and GPS can be achieved on the 5D, you’ll have to purchase additional equipment.
On the other hand, the 6D only has i card slot (SD), versus two on the 5D Marking III (ane SD, 1 CF).
For more serious shooters looking to utilize your camera as a wedding photography backup, or anyone trying to intermission into fast-paced professional person photography, this is going to be a huge deal – and it’due south one of the reasons why the 5D Marking 3 was labeled as a “professional” camera upon its release.
WINNER: Catechism 5D Marking 3
three. Rear LCD & Optical Viewfinders
Both these cameras debuted in 2012, which means that they’re lacking more sophisticated rear LCD features (such as touch on screens).
But both LCDs are quite dainty for what they are: fixed in identify, just crisp and clear, good for focusing and reviewing images alike.
Though LCD resolutions are identical, you do become a bit more than real-estate on the Catechism EOS 5D Marker III, at 3.2 inches (versus 3 inches on the EOS 6D). While this isn’t a huge departure, the bigger the screen the better, especially for anyone who frequently shoots with the LCD.
In terms of viewfinders, you get 100% coverage on the 5D Mark III, compared to 97% on the 6D. I very much dislike using cropped viewfinders – it’s too easy for annoying elements to creep into the edges of the frame – just if you’re used to using a camera with incomplete viewfinder coverage, and so this may non be much of an inconvenience.
WINNER: Canon 5D Mark III
Take a look at the autofocus systems on both these cameras, and you’ll immediately observe some huge differences:
The Catechism EOS 5D Mark III offers 61 AF points, 41 of them cross-type. You also get decent (though hardly frame-filling) autofocus coverage, which is going to significantly improve tracking and AF efficiency.
The Canon 6D, on the other mitt, only packs 11 autofocus points, clustered around the center of the frame. And just one of them (the center point) is cross-type.
All in all, this makes for a decent AF operation from the 5D Mark Iii when using the viewfinder. While information technology’due south non on the same level equally today’s top-level bodies, you’re going to get fast, consequent focusing, fifty-fifty when working with moving subjects.
But things practise slow downward significantly when working in Alive View – here, you’ll take to resign yourself to some very ponderous focusing, or you’ll want to skip Live View shooting entirely.
The 6D, on the other hand, is a poor AF performer beyond the board. The 11 autofocus points don’t offering much in the fashion of tracking, though you can nail nonetheless subjects pretty fast (equally long as you’re okay with focus-and-recompose techniques).
So if you’re a budding sports or action shooter, go with the 5D Mark III.
WINNER: Canon 5D Mark Iii
You’ll discover a similar story here:
A vi fps continuous shooting speed on the Catechism EOS 5D Mark 3, compared to a four.five fps continuous shooting speed on the Canon EOS 6D.
Honestly, neither of these is great for sports, wildlife, or street photography – but you’ll exist able to make do with the Canon 5D Mark Iii. The 6D, on the other mitt, is merely likewise slow for serious activity shooting.
Neither buffer is ultra-impressive, but the 5D has a slight edge here, every bit well: xviii RAW photos or 16270 JPEGs, versus 17 RAW photos or 1250 JPEGs on the Canon 6D.
WINNER: Catechism 5D Mark III
half dozen. Paradigm Quality
The Canon EOS 5D Marker Three and the Canon EOS 6D are both full-frame cameras, which means that you tin can await generally potent high-ISO performance across the board from both bodies.
While I’d requite the Canon 6D a slight border in terms of high-ISO noise performance, it’s a shut call. And I tin really only tell the difference betwixt RAW files when zoomed in to 100%.
On the 5D Mark Three, dissonance starts to creep in at effectually ISO 1600, becoming more apparent at ISO 3200 and becoming unusable around ISO 12800 (though the latter judgment depends heavily on your intentions).
The 6D is similar, though information technology shows less noise at ISO 1600. I’d experience comfortable pushing ISO to 6400, but later that things kickoff to await a bit iffy.
Note that the 6D does take a slightly smaller pixel count, which contributes to this slight difference in noise: 20 megapixels versus 22.three megapixels.
Only while this resolution difference matters slightly in terms of image quality, you’re not going to notice much in terms of increased cropping capabilities from the 5D Mark Iii; two megapixels just isn’t going to get you lot much of a boost.
In terms of dynamic range, both these cameras are pretty disappointing, offer about 12 stops at a maximum (11.7 on the 5D Mark 3, 12.i on the 6D). Canon isn’t the best manufacturer when it comes to DR, simply a number of its more recent bodies can crush the 6D or the 5D Mark III, including the 5D Mark IV and the Canon EOS R.
To sum upwardly:
If you’re a frequent low-light shooter, both of these cameras are going to be more than acceptable. The 6D is ameliorate past a hair, but you may not notice a difference in practice.
In terms of dynamic range and megapixels, differences are besides subtle to exist significant, with the Canon 5D Mark 3 slightly alee on resolution and slightly backside on dynamic range.
WINNER: Canon 6D
If you lot’re looking to shoot video forth with stills, then both of these cameras are going to be pretty equal – and far from impressive.
The Catechism 6D and the Canon 5D Marking III both offer 1080p shooting at 30 frames per 2nd. This isn’t up to electric current standards, where many cameras offer 4K/30p shooting.
And even older DSLRs tend to feature at least total HD at 60p.
You do get a microphone jack on both cameras, though only the 5D Mark 3 packs a headphone port.
While you lot can record HD video on either i of these models, in that location are enough of other options on the marketplace that volition let for far better video (and at a decent price, besides).
You’re going to struggle to find either of these cameras new – but used, they’re both available for bargain prices.
And that is why they’re both great first full-frame options for enthusiasts.
The 6D is slightly cheaper than the 5D Mark Three, at around US$500-$550. Only the 5D Marking Three is only US$800-$850 or then, which is an fantabulous cost for a camera offering so many excellent features.
(The original retail prices, by the mode, reflected this difference. You could grab the 5D Mark III for around $2,800, compared to $2,099 for the 6D.)
In many ways, the 5D Mark III
the meliorate photographic camera.
So the existent question is:
Are you willing to pay an extra $300 for it?
WINNER: Catechism 6D
Canon 6D vs 5D Mark Three | Final Words
The Catechism EOS 6D and the Canon EOS 5D Marking 3 are both fantabulous cameras, even if they take been succeeded by more powerful (albeit pricier) options.
Think that while both bodies offering comparable epitome quality, the 5D Mark III packs significantly better autofocus, slightly meliorate build quality, a 100%-coverage viewfinder, and dual card slots.
On the other mitt, the 6D is smaller and lighter, plus information technology offers born wi-fi and GPS.
Ultimately, the pick is yours – and volition depend on what y’all want to shoot. If y’all’re thinking of dabbling in any action-related photography (street, sports, wildlife, bird) and then go with the 5D Mark Iii. Information technology’south worth the extra money.
If you’re planning on shooting any fast-paced events where redundancy is important, then you lot should also become with the 5D Mark III. The dual card slots are going to be central.
Merely if you want great image quality in a smaller parcel and are looking for a great camera for travel photography, casual everyday photography, or even landscape photography – then the 6D is a great buy.
Canon 5D Mark III
Sturdy, reliable camera that stands the examination of time and makes for an excellent entry signal into the full-frame DSLR market.
Bank check Current Price