Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens Review
Ask a agglomeration of photographers what their favorite lens is – and you lot will probable hear the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens mentioned. It is
sharp, small, light, inexpensive and
with an f1.4 aperture,
The 50 f/1.4 finds a habitation with many photographers – from pro to coincidental – for several reasons.
The first reason for the popularity of this Canon lens is
Although it is soft wide open up, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens is sharp at f/2 and very abrupt when stopped down to f/2.8 or narrower. Corners are soft until f/2 for ane.6x FOVCF bodies and f/2.eight on full frame bodies. Potent halation is present at f/1.4 (a soft, dreamy await) with some CA (Chromatic Abnormality). Colors and contrast (later the halation diminishes at f/two or so) are very nice. The 50 f/1.iv’s 8-blade aperture creates a good foreground/background blur quality. Light fall-off is noticeable through f/2 on a Full Frame trunk, When mounted on a i.6x FOVCF body, calorie-free fall-off is noticeable only through f/1.6 or and then. My exposures with this lens run about one/three stop brighter than with most of my other lenses.
(WxL: 2.ix” 10 2″/73.8mm x 50.5mm) and
(ten.2 oz/290g) are partially responsible for the popularity enjoyed by the Catechism EF 50mm f/one.four USM Lens. This lens is not a bother to carry mounted – or in a jacket pocket for use as needed. Overall build quality is decent but not fantabulous. While the metal lens mount is skilful, the focus band fit and function is but adequate. The l f/1.4 features a quiet merely not-and then-well-damped Micro USM (Ultrasonic Motor) motor – this is skilful just non as good as the Ring USM motors in many of the higher quality Canon lenses. FTM (Full Time Manual) focusing is supported. The 50 f/1.4 extends up to 5/16″ during focusing – the filter does non rotate.
One of the most influential factors of this lens’ popularity is the
low price. Most of usa care deeply well-nigh this factor. The 50 f/1.iv is a really good value lens.
Over and over, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.four USM Lens (above centre) is compared to 1 of Canon’due south other 50mm lenses – the Canon EF 50mm f/i.8 2 (above left) and the newer Catechism EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens (above right). The same lenses are shown beneath with their lens hoods in place (optional with the two not-L 50mm lenses).
Moving your lens selection from the left-most lens to the correct-well-nigh lens makes a huge departure in your wallet. I’ll outline some of the
differences between these 3 models
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.viii Two Lens is the depression end 50. Information technology delivers very expert paradigm sharpness – particularly for the extremely depression price. It is even slightly sharper than the f/1.2 from f/2.eight through f/viii or then. It is very light (4.6 oz/130g) and very small (2.seven” x ane.6″/68.2mm x 41.0mm – WxL). CA is minimal.
The downsides … Outset, the 50mm f/1.viii lens feels similar a toy (for the relative toll, it is practically disposable). It has all-plastic construction including the lens mount (the optics are glass of course). A 5-blade aperture delivers a very harsh background blur quality and flare is a problem for this lens. It delivers only adequate colour compared to the 2 other 50s. AF is noisy and the MF ring is barely useable – at that place is no FTM and no altitude window or markings. Merely, it is a very sharp lens for a toll that is a minor fraction of the cost of the l f/ane.4.
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens falls in the middle of the 3 50s I am discussing in many ways. It has the eye cost, the center build quality, the centre weight, the middle size … Information technology delivers the middle background blur quality – much better than the f/1.8 but non as good equally the f/1.2. Information technology shows the middle amount of CA, but oft shows strong halation at f/1.4. It besides shows the heart amount of flare – noticeably less than the f/1.8 and noticeably more than the f/1.2. Again, in the vignetting category, the fifty f/ane.4 delivers better performance than the f/1.8 but does not perform every bit well equally the f/ane.two (at the same aperture settings). Information technology is slightly sharper than the l f/1.two from f/2.something through f/eight or so and slightly sharper than the l f/1.eight at all comparable apertures (the f/1.8 wins some Full Frame corner comparisons). The 50 f/1.four quietly focuses slightly faster than the f/1.2, but is not well damped. The f/i.iv’s MF ring is much more than usable than the 50 f/one.eight’southward but is non most as nice as the 50 f/1.2’s. My l f/1.iv exposes ane/3 terminate brighter than the other 2 50s (the other two being right). The 50mm f/1.4 delivers splendid paradigm quality for the price.
The Catechism EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens is by far the nearly expensive of the three lenses. My biggest disappointment with this lens is its lack of sharpness. For the price, I would expect to meet information technology easily beat the other two 50mm lenses in this regard. Beneath f/2 or and so, information technology is the sharper lens at the aforementioned aperture settings. Beyond this, it is not. Focus speed is not faster than the f/i.four merely it does utilize Ring USM and the manual focus ring is very smooth and well damped. It does not extend during focusing. The 50 f/1.ii has better flare control with far less halation at wide apertures, but it shows the most CA broad open. The 50 f/1.2 is a far-better built lens than either of the other 50s – as you would expect for a Canon 50 Serial Lens. It likewise is larger (3.4 x 2.6″ / 85.4mm x 65.5mm) and weighs more (19.2 oz / 545g). The l f/one.two is conditions-sealed (when equiped with a filter). Unlike the other two 50mm lenses, I don’t regard this lens every bit a smashing value – but information technology is worth the price to those who need/desire its advantages.
Although the maximum aperture opening differences betwixt these lenses is obvious, the touch on of the lens design and aperture blades on the background blur is non. In the in a higher place comparing image, the background mistiness of the Catechism EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens (left), Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens (centre) and Canon EF 50mm f/ane.eight Ii Lens (correct) are presented. These pictures were taken using identical (neutral) settings (that include an f/two.8 aperture). A tripod was used – the camera was focused on a stationary test target. In the meridian row of pictures, the difference in groundwork blur harshness is easily seen. In the lower row of pictures, the result of the shape and quantity of the aperture blades tin easily exist seen even at the relatively wide f/two.8 aperture. As I noted before, the f/1.2 performs all-time in the bokeh category – followed by the f/i.4.
The image quality of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens is similar to that of the far more expensive Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens at 50mm at the same aperture settings. In fact, I would requite the edge in corner image quality to the 50mm f/1.4 from f/two.8 to f/iv.0. Otherwise, the two lenses are similar. Color was also similar between the ii. If you are choosing betwixt these two lenses, image quality should not exist a differentiator for you.
Positioned in a higher place from left to right in their fully retracted positions are the following lenses:
Canon EF 50mm f/1.four USM Lens
Canon EF 85mm f/1.viii USM Lens
Catechism EF 100mm f/ii.0 USM Lens
Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Lens
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens
The same lenses are shown below in their fully extended states with their lens hoods in identify.
With a minimum focus altitude of 1.5′ (.45m), the l f/1.4 has a relatively low maximum magnification of .15x. Calculation extension tubes take maximum magnification to .39x and .68x for 12mm and 25mm tubes respectively.
The 50 f/i.four takes the optional ES-71 Ii Lens Hood and ships with no lens pouch/case. A Lowepro Lens Case 1W works very well for this lens with the hood installed. Without the hood, a Lowepro Lens Case 1s would provide a more compact solution. The 50 f/1.four has a pocket-sized 58mm filter size – a relatively inexpensive size.
The Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens is very useful for
low-light indoor photography
when a wink is not permitted, appropriate or desired. It works very well in a church building or gym for example.
The 50 f/1.iv is a practiced lens and focal length for
full-torso portraits. Keep in heed that when mounted on a 1.6x FOVCF body, you lot need some extra space to reach the total-torso portrait. On these bodies, this lens makes a fine caput/shoulders portrait lens likewise.
The 50 f/1.four makes a good
– particularly for low lite situations not hands handled by a general purpose lens. When space is tight and light weight is important, this lens might be the right 1 for you.
The 50 f/ane.4 is shown in a higher place mounted on a Canon 1D X DSLR and compared the higher quality Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens.
If you lot just need a 50mm focal length, this lens is a great selection. Overall, I think the Canon EF 50mm f/i.4 USM Lens is a
– and a
very good value.
Bringing you this site is my full-time chore (typically 60-80 hours per calendar week). Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from y’all using the links on this site to brand whatever purchase. I am grateful for your support! – Bryan
My Recommended Canon EF 50mm f/ane.iv USM Lens Retailers
Rent the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Lens
The Tip Jar
Bryan Recommends Buying Information technology Here