Canon Eos R Vs Eos Rp

By | 18/10/2022

Canon EOS R vs RP: the prices take got so shut that it’s at present a serious question!

Canon EOS R vs RP

This Canon EOS R vs RP comparison has become a lot more than relevant! Back when Canon introduced the


(opens in new tab)

(was it actually as contempo as 2018?) everything was unproblematic. This was the only total-frame mirrorless EOS you could buy so you didn’t have to agonise over specs, features and prices.

When Canon  introduced the EOS RP
(opens in new tab)

information technology as well introduced a lot of questions. The EOS RP was a much cheaper entry point into Canon’s new EOS R organization, and all of a sudden you had to figure out whether the more advanced specs and build of the EOS R were really worth the money. For a long time that was the status quo.

Just then the EOS R5
(opens in new tab)

and EOS R6
(opens in new tab)

happened. Both were more than advanced than the dear old EOS R, both had full-width 4K (the EOS R5, of course, has 8K too), and both had in-trunk stabilization. That left the original EOS R looking a bit sick and old. It’due south non, of form. Information technology’s a rather good photographic camera with plenty of qualities and plenty of life left in it. But the photographic camera market being what it is, the prices dropped, and dropped, and dropped… but y’all can notwithstanding buy it. And at today’southward prices, the EOS R, even without in-body stabilization, looks rather proficient. It’south also non a whole lot more expensive than the cheapskate (sad, Catechism) EOS RP.

So we’ve broken downwardly all the key specifications and differences to examine them one by one to help you determine which is best for you; the deliberately cheap Catechism EOS RP or the newly-inexpensive Canon EOS R.

• Encounter likewise:

Canon EOS R vs Sony A7 III

(opens in new tab)


Canon EOS R10 vs EOS RP

Canon EOS RP vs EOS R

1. Canon EOS R vs RP: Sensor

Both cameras have full-frame CMOS sensors, but the EOS R has slightly college resolution at 30.3 million pixels versus 26.two million pixels in the EOS RP. It’s a pocket-sized difference that’due south not terribly significant on its own. The EOS R brings other enhancements and features too, but if outright resolution is all you’re interested in, the EOS R’s advantage is adequately marginal.

Canon EOS R thanks to its modest resolution advantage

two. Processor and ISO range

It’s not merely the sensor that affects a photographic camera’s operation but its image processor too, and hither the playing field is expressionless level. The EOS RP and the EOS R both have Catechism’s DIGIC 8 image processor and, interestingly, they both have the company’s DLO (Digital Lens Optimizer) feature for enhancing fine item in images shot with Canon lenses.

With the aforementioned processor and similar resolution, information technology’southward perhaps no surprise that the EOS RP and the EOS R offer the standard ISO range of 100-twoscore,000, expandable to ISO l-102,400. We’re quite pleased that Catechism has not reduced the maximum ISO of the EOS RP to keep information technology beneath the EOS R.

No deviation

3. Memory

Even the storage systems are identical. The EOS R has come in for some criticism for having but a unmarried SD/SDHC/SDXC memory card slot, merely information technology is UHS 2 uniform, so while information technology doesn’t accept the new super-fast XQD/CFexpress cards been introduced by other brands, it should yet be quite fast enough – and the EOS RP shares the same UHS Two compatibility. Neither camera supports the latest CFexpress card format, so in that respect, both are starting to look a little dated.

• Winner:
No difference

Canon EOS RP vs EOS R

iv. Image stabilization

Neither camera has in-body prototype stabilisation (unlike Catechism’s newer models) so both rely on lens-based image stabilization. The EOS RP does offer Digital IS for movies, which is non mentioned in the EOS R’s specifications, though the EOS R is better adjusted to professional video use equally we’ll see shortly.

Catechism EOS RP past a small margin, possibly, simply neither has IBIS

5. Shutter speed range

At present the differences showtime to emerge. The EOS RP has a shutter speed range of 30-1,4000sec plus B, while the EOS R offers xxx-i/8000sec plus B. That ane/8000sec shutter speed on the EOS R is non something y’all’ll use every day, just indicates a more avant-garde shutter machinery and some conscious differentiation betwixt this camera and the cheaper EOS RP.

• Winner:
Canon EOS R with a slightly higher 1/8000sec maximum

6. Autofocus

The differences become more pronounced with the autofocus system. Both cameras offering Catechism’s on-sensor Dual Pixel CMOS AF, as nosotros’d expect, only while the EOS R offers v,635 selectable autofocus points, the EOS RP’s full is slightly lower at 4,779 AF points. Both are huge numbers, of course, and in other respects these cameras look evenly-matched, both offering 88% horizontal and 100% vertical coverage.

But in that location are some important differences. The EOS R tin can focus in lite levels down to -6EV, while the EOS RP is slightly backside at -5EV. The EOS RP hits back, though, with what Catechism claimed at launch to exist the world’due south fastest AF speed of 0.05sec and, more importantly, the inclusion of Eye AF.

While the EOS RP sneaks ahead in a couple of areas, though, it has a major drawback for videographers – Dual Pixel CMOS AF is not available when shooting 4K video. For static videographers who prefer manual focus that might not be a problem, but for vloggers and journalists this could be a major drawback that forces them to drop the resolution to total HD, where Dual Pixel CMOS AF is available.

• Winner:
Canon EOS R, especially for video

7. Video

That’s non the merely difference between these two cameras’ video features. Both apply a heavy crop to 4K video footage, which does offer like framing to the Super 35mm movie format but is unpopular with those who want full sensor width capture and no changes to the constructive focal length of their lenses.

Regardless of that, the EOS R offers slightly faster 30p 4K UHD video against the 25p maximum of the EOS RP – and, of class, the Dual Pixel CMOS AF remains available, which is likely to be a far more of import point  to videographers.

While other specs are the same, including a 4K time-lapse mode and full Hard disk drive at 60p/50p/30p/25p, with 4:2:0 8-flake internal recording, the EOS R can salve 10-chip 4:2:2 video to an external recorder while the EOS RP but offers eight-bit. More importantly, the EOS R comes with Canon Log 1 style (12 stops of dynamic range at ISO 400) but the EOS RP does not.

While these 2 cameras might look quite like on newspaper, in that location are some quite astringent restrictions on the EOS RP’s video capability compared to the EOS R.

• Winner:
Canon EOS R, for AF and external output particularly

8. Continuous shooting

The EOS R is also a more powerful tool for sports and action photography. The EOS RP offers a pretty small-scale 5fps continuous shooting speed, and this drops to 4fps with AF Tracking enabled. The EOS R is much faster at 8fps, though speeds accept a bigger hit if you lot employ AF Tracking, dropping to 5fps.

The buffer capacities are similar. The EOS RP, with its lower resolution images, can keep shooting JPEGs until the memory menu is full, or l raw files in a outburst. The college resolution EOS R is limited to 100 JPEGs (still plenty) and can capture 47 raw files or 78 images in Canon’s new and more than efficient C-RAW format.

The EOS R also offers Canon’s DP RAW (Dual Pixel RAW) mode for maximising fine item (though we’ve never noticed a big deviation in side by side comparisons).

• Winner:
Canon EOS R for its 8fps continuous shooting speed

(opens in new tab)

9. Size and weight

This is where the differences between the EOS RP and the EOS R are most obvious. The EOS RP measures 132.5 x 85.0 ten 70.0mm and weighs just 485g, body merely, while the EOS R comes in at 135.8 x 98.3 ten 84.4mm and 660g.

The EOS R has been designed more for handling than compactness, and information technology’s not just wider, taller and fatter than the EOS RP, it’s also 175g heavier. Only small size and light weight aren’t everything. While the EOS RP is pocket-sized, many of Canon’s RF lenses are not, and we’re willing to bet that the EOS R will feel a improve-balanced camera with many of these new lenses.

• Winner:
Catechism EOS RP on newspaper, Canon EOS R (we suspect) in practice

x. Design and layout

Quite apart from the operational differences, there are big physical differences between the EOS RP and the EOS R. The EOS RP is a much smaller camera, just Canon has nevertheless constitute the infinite to include a regular mode punch – a feature missing on the EOS R. What the EOS R does accept is Catechism’s clever/controversial Multi-function Touch Bar, and a useful tiptop-mounted status brandish for photographic camera settings.

Close, and down to personal preference

(opens in new tab)

xi. Viewfinder and rear screen

You’d expect Catechism to look for places to save money on the EOS RP, and the viewfinder is one place where this has happened. Its 0.39-inch OLED EVF has a reasonable resolution of 2.36 million dots and offers 100% coverage with 0.7x magnification. The EOS R, however, has a larger 0.v-inch OLED EVF with iii.69 million dots, the same 100% coverage and a larger 0.76x magnification.

The EOS R likewise has a ameliorate rear screen. Both cameras have vari-angle touchscreens, but where the EOS RP makes practice with a 3.0-inch 1.04 meg dot display, the EOS R has a larger 3.xv-inch screen with two.1 meg dot resolution. Quite ofttimes information technology’s not one single feature that helps you choose one photographic camera over some other, but a steady accumulation of small advantages similar this 1.

• Winner:
Canon EOS R, size and resolution over again

12. Battery life and connectivity

Bombardment life is another surface area where the more expensive EOS R wins. Its LP-E6 battery has the capacity for 370 shots, which is but average compared to rival full-frame mirrorless cameras, but well ahead of the meagre 250 shots you lot go from the LP-E17 battery in the EOS RP.

There’s a flake of a sting in the tail with the connectivity features too. Both cameras accept Wi-Fi, microphone and headphone sockets, HDMI output and USB ports – merely where the EOS R supports USB three.ane, the EOS RP makes do with old-tech USB ii.0. That might not be a problem if yous utilise a card reader, but could be real elevate if you utilise USB for epitome/video transfer.

• Winner:
Canon EOS R, with better bombardment life and USB

(opens in new tab)

Canon EOS R vs RP: Prices and verdict

The EOS R is still more than expensive than the EOS RP, but its prices accept been discounted more heavily and the gap is smaller than it was. The EOS R remains the ameliorate camera in a significant number of areas, though the EOS RP does run information technology pretty close for everyday apprentice apply, being both smaller and lighter and notwithstanding significantly cheaper.

There’s a lot to weigh upwardly when choosing betwixt the EOS RP and the EOS R. Is the EOS R worth all that actress coin? Do you lose too many primal features when y’all ‘downgrade’ to the much cheaper EOS RP?

If y’all just want to dip your toe into the full-frame mirrorless camera market place and you’re a stills photographer rather than a video specialist, the EOS RP is almost as proficient at a massively reduced price.

Merely if you’re a pro photographer and/or videographer, nosotros call up the extra performance and features of the EOS R will soon make you forget how much extra you paid for it. You can save some money with the EOS RP, but yous might regret your cheapskating in the futurity.

You can see the latest Canon EOS R vs EOS RP price comparisons beneath.

How we examination cameras

We test mirrorless and DSLR cameras both in existent-globe shooting scenarios and in carefully controlled lab weather. Our lab tests measure resolution, dynamic range and signal to noise ratio. Resolution is measured using ISO resolution charts, dynamic range is measured using DxO Analyzer test equipment and DxO Analyzer is also used for noise analysis across the photographic camera’s ISO range. We use these existent-world testing and lab results to inform our comments in buying guides. For compact cameras and phones, we gauge on existent world treatment and photographic results alone.

Read more:

• Canon EOS RP won’t impale M series, Catechism confirms
(opens in new tab)

• DSLR vs mirrorless cameras: How do they compare?
(opens in new tab)

• Catechism EOS R5: Everything we know so far
(opens in new tab)

• Catechism EOS R6: Latest news and rumors
(opens in new tab)

Thank you lot for reading 5 manufactures this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £i / $1 / €1

*Read 5 gratis articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for only
£ane / $ane / €1

Rod is an independent photography journalist and editor, and a long-continuing Digital Camera Earth correspondent, having previously worked equally DCW’s Group Reviews editor. Earlier that he has been technique editor on Due north-Photo, Head of Testing for the photography sectionalization and Camera Aqueduct editor on TechRadar, besides as contributing to many other publications. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they outset appeared, and earlier that began his career writing about motion-picture show photography. He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the by 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, calorie-free meters, camera bags and more. Rod has his own camera gear blog at
(opens in new tab)

only also writes almost photograph-editing applications and techniques at
(opens in new tab)

Related articles