Canon R5 Vs Sony A7riv

by -148 views

Information technology’s no secret that Sony has dominated the full frame mirrorless game these past couple of years with its unmatched autofocusing and dynamic range. Unfortunately, Canon and Nikon were late to the game coming out with their get-go mirrorless cameras back in 2018. Now, 2 years afterwards, Canon has made huge strides forward with the release of the EOS R5 and R6 cameras, closing the gap on Sony.

When the EOS R came out, many Canon DSLR shooters were still wary of switching over to the mirrorless ecosystem. But it’s a whole new ball game with the launch of the EOS R5 which has loyal Canon users jumping at the latest mirrorless system.

Let’southward take a look at the ii loftier megapixel mirrorless powerhouses of 2020—the Canon EOS R5 vs. the Sony A7R IV. Information technology’southward about impossible to discover a camera that meets the needs of every photographer, but for high resolution total frame still cameras, these ii come pretty shut.

 Canon EOS R5 vs. Sony A7R IV Specification Chart

Camera Feature

Catechism EOS R5 Sony A7R IV
Release Engagement July 9th 2020 July 16th 2019
Mountain Type RF Mount E-Mountain
Sensor Resolution 45 MP 61 MP
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size 36 x 24mm 35.7 x 23.8mm
Low Pass Filter Yes No
Sensor Pixel Size iv.40µ iii.76µ
Image Size 8,192 ten 5,464 9,504 x half dozen,336
Image Processor DIGIC X BIONZ X
In-torso Paradigm Stabilization Yes Yes
Max Buffer Chapters (Rated, RAW) 180 images (CFexpress) 68 images (UHS-II)
Native ISO Sensitivity 100-51,200 100-32,000
Additional ISO Sensitivity 50-102,400 l-102,400
Dust Reduction/Sensor Cleaning Yep Aye
Calibrations No No
Viewfinder Type (Electronic) EVF (Electronic) EVF
Viewfinder Resolution 5.76 meg dots five.76 1000000 dots
LCD Screen 3.2″ 3″
LCD Articulating Screen Full Tilting
Born Flash No No
Storage 2x SD (CFexpress + UHS-2) 2x SD (UHS-II)
Continuous Shooting Speed (Mechanical) 12 FPS 10 FPS
Max Shutter Speed 1/8000 to 30 sec 1/8000 to thirty sec
Auto Focusing System Dual Pixel CMOS AF 2 Hybrid Phase-Detection
Number of AF Positions 5,940 567
Low Lite Sensitivity -six to +20 EV -3 to +20 EV
Video Max Resolution 8K RAW xxx FPS 4K 30 FPS
1080p Video Max Frame Rate threescore FPS 120 FPS
Internal Recording 4:2:2, ten-chip 4:ii:two 8-bit
Video Crop 1.0x 1.0x
Audio Recording Built-in stereo microphone, optional external stereo microphone Built-in stereo microphone, optional external stereo microphone
Headphone Jack Aye Aye
LCD Resolution 2,100,000 dots 1,440,000 dots
Pixel Shift No Yep, 241MP
Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes, 5.0 Yes, iv.1
Battery Type LP-E6NH (320 shots) NP-FZ100 (670 shots)
Shutter Durability Count 500,000 500,000
Weather condition-Sealed Body Yes Yes
USB Version 3.ane 3.2
Weight 1.63 lbs one.46 lbs
Dimensions five.45 10 three.84 10 3.46 in v.07 x 3.viii ten 3.05 in
Price $iii,899 $three,499

Both cameras are fairly new with Sony’s release appointment dorsum in July 2019 and Canon’south in July 2020. With a twelvemonth apart, at that place are a few advantages the Canon has over the Sony but with everything considered, there are pros and cons to both cameras.

Resolution & Processing Power

To start, the obvious divergence is the megapixel count. The Canon having 45MP while the Sony has 61MP. Considering both exceed the average amount of resolution in a full-frame photographic camera, the Sony A7R 4 all the same has a leg up on the Canon R5 in terms of flat out resolution detail to piece of work with for stills. Sony takes information technology even further with its pixel shift adequacy to create upwards to 241MP images available for still life photographs.

However Catechism’s newer processor is able to employ their 45MP sensor to capture impressive 8K RAW video footage, an manufacture first for a camera at this price range, albeit with estrus restricted record limits. Regardless, photographers should take into business relationship the corporeality of storage needed for such large files.

the top of both the canon eos r5 and the sony a7riv

Camera Design and Construction

In terms of the actually physical characteristics of each photographic camera, the size of the EOS R5 is going to be just a fleck bigger than that of the Sony A7R 4 merely non by much. One major deviation in the ergonomics is that the R5 has two LCD screens, one the dorsum of the photographic camera also as a top display for photographic camera settings, battery life metrics and more. On the aforementioned note, the Canon features a fully articulating LCD touch on screen while the Sony comes with a tilting impact screen. Both are made with magnesium alloy bodies and are conditions sealed.

Ane major characteristic that Canon users rejoiced about in the EOS R5 was the addition of a 2nd menu slot. Both the Sony A7R 4 and Canon EOS R5 come equipped with two slots but now the R5 has i slot compatible with the newer and faster CFexpress memory card equally well equally a UHS-II slot. The Sony on the other hand provides two UHS-2 carte du jour slots.

Bombardment Life

When comparison battery life, the Sony is considerably better with its FZ-100 battery. Information technology has estimated 670 shots per full charge compared to 320 in the Canon. In addition, both cameras have the ability to be charged via USB, but the Sony has the option to charge while in employ. For more than peace of heed for either camera, it’southward smart to have extra batteries on hand or a battery grip.

Lens Selection

Although, not everything is weighed past the features of the body alone, users also should consider the choice of mirrorless lenses available. Since Sony mirrorless has been around for much longer, they have a larger range of native make lenses available with 44 options compared to Catechism’s 15. Sony as well boasts dozens more loftier-quality and affordable 3rd party lens options from manufacturer’s like Tamron and Sigma.

Nosotros took matters into our own hands and tested both cameras with the same settings. The images higher up were taken handheld at 1/125th of a second, 70mm, F2.8 at ISO 800. The Canon image is definitely warmer straight out of camera and is credible on the model’s confront and the walls, while the Sony renders a cooler image and highlights more green tones in the reckoner screen. Both cameras are capable of producing amazing images and with RAW recording can exist shifted in anyway the photographer prefers. So which direction are yous leaning?