Re: Image Stabilization between the a6300 & a6500
2
Baurox wrote:
I’yard considering either buying the a6300 or a6500 just having difficulties about justifying paying a skilful more than chunk of change solely for the image stabilization.
Here is a perfect instance of what I’g trying to achieve filming wise and giving you a improve idea of what verbal I’m trying to practise;
Any advice helps, looking to do a lot of cinematic piece of work on the mountain. Thanks!
I’grand pretty good at post-production image stabilization but still could utilise a helper hither an at that place if the 6500 is still a practiced choice that helps.
I’m looking for a HUGE departure, something like 30-40% increase noticeable look, not just little tid $.25 here an there.
I know this topic has been covered earlier, but I institute this video and find information technology incredibly powerful in my decision TOWARDS a 6500;
BUT….is that much of a difference noticeable on a snowboarding (moving camera) video ?
Then that’s more of my dilemma when it comes to the microscopic level, haha.
A6300 with the money saved for a gimbal will be better than simply the a6500 solitary.
— hide signature —
Some Sony stuff
OP
Baurox •
New Member
• Posts: 19
Re: Prototype Stabilization between the a6300 & a6500
Euell wrote:
What unstabilized lens or lenses are you proposing to use?
Don’t know just nevertheless, but I read somewhere that the 6500 makes all lenses use stabilization either style when fastened?
But I feel it will be either a unproblematic 16mm, no zoom when I’m riding / following the rider.
I’m more looking for a reason to save $300-500 and use that extra $$ towards more gear vs the 6500 and really simply seeing a slight improvment that either;
A: shows a significant difference
b: Doesn’t show a meaning difference that isn’t noticeable to 90% of the viewers
Welcome to my brain, lol.
CE3 •
Contributing Member
• Posts: 706
Re: Image Stabilization betwixt the a6300 & a6500
Baurox wrote:
I know this topic has been covered earlier, but I found this video and find it incredibly powerful in my decision TOWARDS a 6500;
Merely….is that much of a deviation noticeable on a snowboarding (moving photographic camera) video ?
So that’s more of my dilemma when it comes to the microscopic level, haha.
Interesting. I really found I preferred the A6300 footage in that video most of the time. The OSS in the 18-105 is very well optimized, though.
The 18-105 is an fantabulous lens option to consider for video. The zooming mechanism of the eighteen-105 is all internal (no extending), so you won’t observe a better zoom to pair with a gimbal.
For the kind of footage you programme to shoot, you’re going to need some kind external stabilization (gimbal / steadicam) setup regardless. You might too desire to invest in an extended ADH warranty, or wait into more than rugged camera bodies for snowboarding like the Olympus E-M1 Mark II and the Panasonic GH5.
Sony a6400
Sony a7R IV
Sony 85mm F1.iv ZA Carl Zeiss Planar T*
Sony 135mm F1.viii ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T*
Voigtlander 35mm F1.2 Nokton
+half dozen more