Fuji X-t3 Vs Olympus E-m1 Ii

For a more detailed size comparison, come across the section further downward beneath.

Fujifilm 10-T3 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark Ii: Specifications at a glance

Ten-T3

• Introduced in September 2018
• Mirrorless
• Sensor: APS-C
• 26 megapixel
• 20 frames/second
• 160 – 12800 ISO
• 3840 10 2160 Video
• Viewfinder: Elektronic
• 76.00mm (three.0″) Monitor, articulated
• Lens mount X-Bajonett
• WiFi built-in
• 132.5 10 92.8 10 58.8mm³ (5.2″ x 3.7″ ten 2.iii”)
• 539g (17.iv oz.)

All specs: Primary page for X-T3

OM-D E-M1 Marker II

• Introduced in September 2016
• Mirrorless
• Sensor: Four Thirds
• xx megapixel
• 15 frames/2d
• 200 – 25600 ISO
• 4096 ten 2160 Video
• Viewfinder: Elektronic
• 76.00mm (iii.0″) Monitor, articulated
• Lens mount Micro Four Thirds (MFT)
• WiFi congenital-in
• 134.1 ten ninety.9 ten 68.9mm³ (five.3″ x 3.six” x 2.seven”)
• 574g (18.5 oz.)

All specs: Main page for OM-D E-M1 Mark Two

Our advice:
From our own feel, we recommend
SanDisk
memory cards. The SanDisk
Farthermost Pro
is fast enough for high-speed epitome sequences and 4K video:

The 64 GB Extreme will take upwards to 90 minutes of super high-res 4K video. For Full HD video nosotros recommend the SanDisk Ultra.

10-T3 vs OM-D East-M1 Marker Ii: The sensors

The X-T3 features a

APS-C

sized sensor, while the OM-D Due east-M1 Mark 2 uses a
Four Thirds

sensor.

This infographic highlights the sensor areas of both models compared to other mutual sensor formats:

Note:
1-Euro money for calibration; the coin at 23.25mm diameter is slightly smaller than a US quarter.

Boasting an area of 368mm² (0.59 sq.in.) the sensor of the X-T3 is somewhat larger than the OM-D E-M1 Marker II’s chip at 225mm² (0.36 sq.in.). In well-nigh cases a larger sensor volition yield better results in low lite, a considerable advantage in many situations (e.g. interior images), a clear disadvantage of the Four Thirds format.

Advantage:
Fujifilm X-T3

X-T3 vs OM-D E-M1 Marking Ii: The viewfinders

The X-T3 uses an electronic viewfinder with a resolution of 3.69 megapixel. The magnifcation is c. 0.75x.

The OM-D E-M1 Marker II features an electronic viewfinder with a resolution of ii.36 megapixel and a magnification of around 0.74x.

This infographic illustrates the viewfinder magnifications of both cameras. The black area represents a magnification of 1x, corresponding to natural size; indicated in red is a magnification of 0.85x, the highest value in a any photographic camera on the market place today.

Ten-T3 (0.75x)

OM-D Eastward-M1 Mark Ii (0.74x)

Annotation:
Differences in the image expanse are the result of unlike paradigm ratios, three:2 or 4:3. That tin brand it difficult to compare the viewfinder magnification of both cameras.

Reward Fujifilm 10-T3…

(Signal weight and unit, if applicable, in parentheses)

X-T3

OM-D E-M1 Marking II

Conclusion:
Advantages of the X-T3 are the larger sensor, the higher resolution and that the camera is faster. Additional pros for the Fujifilm are the faster and more accurate automobile focus, the better viewfinder and the more compact size.

The Ten-T3 scores
24 points.

…and here’s where the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Marker Two has an edge…

(Indicate weight and unit of measurement, if applicable, in parentheses)

X-T3

OM-D E-M1 Mark 2

Conclusion:
Advantages of the OM-D E-M1 Marker II are the larger sensitivity, the larger pick of lenses and the optical image stabilizer. A nice touch is the superior video recording and that the bombardment has more than stamina.

Yields
xv points
for the OM-D E-M1 Mark II.

…and here’s what both have in common

X-T3

OM-D E-M1 Mark 2

Front view of the 10-T3 and the OM-D E-M1 Mark II…

…and here we see the Fujifilm and the Olympus from above:

Our recommendation

Comparison features and specifications of both cameras yields the following score:

Fujifilm Ten-T3

Olympus OM-D East-M1 Mark II

24

15

CameraCreativ recommends the
Fujifilm X-T3.