Is Ssd Better Than Hard Disk

By | 30/10/2022

How much faster is an SSD compared with HDD drives and is it worth the price?

solid state drive
can speed up the performance of a computer significantly, often more than what a faster processor (CPU) or RAM can. A
hard disk drive
is cheaper and offers more storage (500 GB to 1 TB are common) while SSD disks are more than expensive and by and large available in 64 GB to 256 GB configurations.

SSDs take several advantages over HDD drives.

Comparison chart

HDD versus SSD comparison nautical chart
  • current rating is
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • v

(443 ratings)

  • current rating is
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

(564 ratings)

Stands for Hard disk Solid State Bulldoze
Speed HDD is slower. HDD has higher latency, longer read/write times, and supports fewer IOPs (input output operations per second) compared to SSD. SSD is faster. SSD has lower latency, faster read/writes, and supports more IOPs (input output operations per 2d) compared to HDD.
Heat, Electricity, Noise Hd drives use more than electricity to rotate the platters, generating estrus and noise. Since no such rotation is needed in solid state drives, they employ less power and do non generate heat or racket.
Defragmentation The performance of HDD drives worsens due to fragmentation; therefore, they need to be periodically defragmented. SSD drive performance is non impacted by fragmentation. So defragmentation is not necessary.
Components HDD contains moving parts – a motor-driven spindle that holds one or more than flat circular disks (called platters) coated with a sparse layer of magnetic textile. Read-and-write heads are positioned on summit of the disks; all this is encased in a metal cas SSD has no moving parts; it is essentially a retentivity chip. Information technology is interconnected, integrated circuits (ICs) with an interface connector. At that place are three basic components – controller, cache and capacitor.
Weight HDDs are heavier than SSD drives. SSD drives are lighter than HDD drives because they do not have the rotating disks, spindle and motor.
Dealing with vibration The moving parts of HDDs brand them susceptible to crashes and damage due to vibration. SSD drives tin can withstand vibration up to 2000Hz, which is much more than than HDD.


HDD disks use spinning platters of magnetic drives and read/write heads for operation. And so start-up speed is slower for HDDs than SSDs considering a spin-up for the disk is needed. Intel claims their SSD is 8 times faster than an HDD, thereby offer faster kick upwardly times.[1]

The following video compares HDD and SSD speeds in the real earth and it’s no surprise that SSD storage comes out ahead in every exam:

Benchmark statistics – small read/writes

  • HDDs: Pocket-sized reads – 175 IOPs, Small-scale writes – 280 IOPs
  • Flash SSDs: Small reads – 1075 IOPs (6x), Small writes – 21 IOPs (0.1x)
  • DRAM SSDs: Small-scale reads – 4091 IOPs (23x), Small-scale writes – 4184 IOPs (14x)

IOPs stand for Input/Output Operations Per Second

Data Transfer in an HDD vs. SSD

In an HDD, data transfer is sequential. The physical read/write caput “seeks” an advisable point in the hard drive to execute the functioning. This seek time can be significant. The transfer rate tin can as well be influenced by file system fragmentation and the layout of the files. Finally, the mechanical nature of hard disks also introduces certain operation limitations.

In an SSD, information transfer is not sequential; information technology is random access so it is faster. There is consequent read operation because the physical location of data is irrelevant. SSDs have no read/write heads and thus no delays due to caput motion (seeking).


Unlike HDD drives, SSD disks do not have moving parts. So SSD reliability is college. Moving parts in an HDD increment the risk of mechanical failure. The rapid motion of the platters and heads within the hard deejay drive make it susceptible to “caput crash”. Caput crashes can be caused by electronic failure, a sudden power failure, concrete daze, habiliment and tear, corrosion, or poorly manufactured platters and heads. Some other gene impacting reliability is the presence of magnets. HDDs utilise magnetic storage and so are susceptible to damage or data corruption when in close proximity with powerful magnets. SSDs are non at risk for such magnetic distortion.


When flash offset started gaining momentum for long-term storage, there were concerns about wear-out, peculiarly with some experts warning that because of the manner SSDs piece of work, there was a limited number of write cycles they could achieve. Yet, SSD manufacturers put a lot of effort in product architecture, drive controllers and read/write algorithms and in practise, wear-out has been a nonissue for SSDs in virtually practical applications.[2]


As of June 2015, SSDs are still more than expensive per gigabyte than hard drives but prices for SSDs have fallen substantially in recent years. While external difficult drives are around $0.04 per gigabyte, a typical flash SSD is near $0.50 per GB. This is downwardly from nigh $2 per GB in early on 2012.

In effect, this means you can purchase a one TB external hard bulldoze (HDD) for $55 on Amazon (see external difficult bulldoze best sellers) while a 1 TB SSD costs near $475. (encounter best sellers listing for internal SSDs and external SSDs).

Toll outlook

In an influential article for
Network Calculating
in June 2015, storage consultant Jim O’Reilly wrote that prices for SSD storage are falling very fast and with 3D NAND applied science, SSD will likely achieve price parity with HDD around the cease of 2016.

At that place are two main reasons for falling SSD prices:

  1. Increasing density: 3D NAND applied science was a breakthrough that allowed a quantum jump in SSD capacity because it allows for packing 32 or 64 times the capacity per dice.
  2. Process efficiency: Flash storage manufacturing has become more efficient and die yields have increased significantly.

A December 2015 article for
Estimator World
projected that xl% of new laptops sold in 2017, 31% in 2016 and 25% of laptops in 2015, will use SSD rather than HDD drives. The article also reported that while HDD prices take not dropped besides much, SSD prices have consistently fallen month over month and are nearing parity with HDD.

Price projections for HDD and SSD storage, by DRAMeXchange. Prices are in US Dollars per gigabyte.


Cost projections for HDD and SSD storage, past DRAMeXchange. Prices are in United states of america Dollars per gigabyte.

Storage capacity

Until recently, SSDs were also expensive and only available in smaller sizes. 128 GB and 256 GB laptops are common when using SSD drives while laptops with HDD internal drives are typically 500 GB to one TB. Some vendors — including Apple — offering “fusion” drives that combine 1 SSD and 1 HDD drive that work seamlessly together.

Still, with 3D NAND, SSDs are likely to close the capacity gap with HDD drives by the end of 2016. In July 2015, Samsung announced it was releasing 2TB SSD drives that utilize SATA connectors.[3]
While HDD technology is likely to cap out at about 10 TB, there is no such restriction for flash storage. In fact, in August 2015, Samsung unveiled the earth’s largest hard drive — a 16TB SSD drive.

Defragmentation in HDDs

Due to the physical nature of HDDs and their magnetic platters that store information, IO operations (reading from or writing to the deejay) piece of work much faster when data is stored contiguously on the disk. When a file’s data is stored on different parts of the disk, IO speeds are reduced because the disk needs to spin for different regions of the disk to come up in contact with the read/write heads. Oft there is non enough face-to-face space bachelor to store all the information in a file. This results in fragmentation of the HDD. Periodic defragmentation is needed to keep the device from slowing down in performance.

With SSD disks, there are no such physical restrictions for the read/write head. And so the physical location of the information on the deejay does not matter as it does not impact performance. Therefore, defragmentation is not necessary for SSD.


HDD disks are aural because they spin. HDD drives in smaller form factors (e.g. 2.5 inch) are quieter. SSD drives are integrated circuits with no moving parts and therefore do not brand noise when operating.

Components and Operation

A typical HDD consists of a spindle that holds one or more than flat round disks (called
platters) onto which the information is recorded. The platters are made from a non-magnetic material and are coated with a thin layer of magnetic cloth. Read-and-write heads are positioned on meridian of the disks. The platters are spun at very high speeds with a motor. A typical difficult drive has ii electrical motors, one to spin the disks and one to position the read/write head assembly. Data is written to a platter as information technology rotates past the read/write heads. The read-and-write head can notice and change the magnetization of the material immediately under it.

Disassembled components of HDD (left) and SSD (right) drives.


Disassembled components of HDD (left) and SSD (correct) drives.

In contrast, SSDs employ microchips, and contain no moving parts. SSD components include a controller, which is an embedded processor that executes firmware-level software and is one of the most important factors of SSD functioning; cache, where a directory of cake placement and wear leveling data are also kept; and energy storage – a capacitor or batteries – and so that data in the cache can exist flushed to the drive when ability is dropped. The primary storage component in an SSD has been DRAM volatile retentivity since they were starting time developed, but since 2009 it is more commonly NAND flash memory. The performance of the SSD can calibration with the number of parallel NAND flash chips used in the device. A single NAND bit is relatively boring. When multiple NAND devices operate in parallel inside an SSD, the bandwidth scales, and the loftier latencies can be hidden, as long as plenty outstanding operations are awaiting and the load is evenly distributed between devices.


  • Wikipedia: Hard deejay drive
  • Wikipedia: Solid-state drive
  • SSD Prices In A Costless Fall –
    Network Computing
  • Samsung announces 2TB solid-state drives for desktops –
    Samsung weblog
  • Samsung unveils ii.five-inch 16TB SSD: The world’s largest hard bulldoze –
    Ars Technica
  • Consumer SSDs and difficult drive prices are nearing parity
  • HDD Shipments Downwardly 20% in Q1 2016, Hit Multi-Year Low –

Share this comparison:

If y’all read this far, y’all should follow us:

“HDD vs SSD.”
Diffen LLC, n.d. Spider web. 9 Nov 2022.
< >