Is The Nikon 14-24mm 2.8 Lens Good For Star Photography

by -37 views

I took the Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.eight South out to see how it performed taking astrophotography and nightscape photos with a Nikon Z6. I’ve compiled notes and comparison images to help those out who are looking at purchasing this lens for astrophotography and nightscape photos.


The wide-angle shooting this lens offers evidently makes it slap-up for shooting the stars due to the exposure times bachelor earlier the stars showtime to trail in an image. Beyond the advantages of shooting at 14mm, I found I really enjoyed having the power to shoot at different focal lengths. For one particular spot, I took images at both 14mm and 20mm without moving my tripod. I concluded upward loving both images on their own because they provide drastically different perspectives of the same scene. I have only ever shot with prime lenses in the past for nightscapes, so to take the ability to dispense the photo without swapping lenses and quickly attempt different compositions is a large plus for me.

The maximum aperture of f/2.8 is definitely a specification I similar on the Nikon Z xiv-24mm f/two.8 as it allows enough light to come through the lens to have astrophotography photos. Shooting at f/2.viii and 14mm, I was able to bring in enough light to go on my ISO set to 3200 and get awesome photos with a 25-second exposure. Additionally, until the release of the Nikon Z xiv-24mm f/2.viii, Nikon only offered the xiv-30mm f/4 in terms of a broad-bending lens for the Z series cameras. The 14-30mm hands knocks its cocky out of the competition for nightscapes with the limited maximum aperture.

The terminal affair I like nigh the Nikon Z 14-24mm lens is the superior optics that 1 would await from a Nikkor lens. 1 concern I had with this lens earlier shooting with it was vignetting at f/2.viii. However, I was surprised to discover that there wasn’t much noticeable vignetting at f/2.eight and overall, the departure in vignetting between f/2.8, f/3.2, and f/3.5 was minimal. I also found in reviewing my images that blackout only seemed to be in a few bright stars in the corners of a handful of images.

A comparison of the vignetting differences for f/2.8, f/3.2 and f/3.5 aperture settings for astrophotography with the Nikon Z xiv-24mm f/two.8 Southward lens.

When reviewing my images, I likewise made sure to take a look at the star trailing in the corners. As expected, there was a picayune but compared to other lenses like my f mount Rokinon 14mm f/ii.8, the Nikon Z 14-24mm is a in a completely dissimilar ball park. Overall, the quality of this lens is incredible. Most people who are merely looking at these images and not pixel peeping would never notice these small imperfections.

A comparing of the vignetting differences for f/2.eight, f/3.two and f/3.v aperture settings for astrophotography with the Nikon Z 14-24mm f/ii.8 S lens.


The kickoff night I took the Z mountain 14-24mm out for astrophotography, I was dumbfounded by the first couple of photos trying to effigy out why all of my photos were out of focus even though the focus showed infinity on the LCD. I’ve shot in the dark with both my 24-70mm kit lens and a Z mountain 20mm in the past with no problem using the digital transmission focus. With this lens, withal, I establish it really hard to dial in the true infinity focus betoken because of how jumpy the transmission focus is while turning the focus ring. If the focus was smooth, I don’t think I would have as much of an result with the digital focus. I also realized that spinning the dial past the infinity point marked on the LCD actually took the focus a footling farther and was a contributing cistron to my unfocused images. I likewise would have liked to see the infinity point that shows on the calibration in the view finder actually represent infinity in social club to not cause confusion to the user. Overall, I wish Nikon had stuck with a mechanically based system for manual focus.

Evident blackout I establish in ane of my images.

Another dislike for me on the Z Mount 14-24mm lens is easily the price: currently $two,396. I came to that opinion from the standpoint that I was out evaluating this lens but with respect to shooting astrophotography and nightscapes. I get that the fourteen-24mm gives the user a range to choose from and every location shot at will have a slightly different need based on the limerick available, but if a buyer is only wanting to use this lens for astrophotography I think there are more economical options such as the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.viii. Where I am willing to dorsum off of my opinion a little bit is if the user is someone who plans to too use the fourteen-24mm for other photography genres. At that point, the lens serves more than 1 purpose and trying to purchase 2 separate broad-angle lenses to fit multiple needs adds upward to a comparable cost bespeak of the xiv-24mm.

My terminal dislike on the Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 is more of a large wish from Nikon: f/2.8 is more than than enough aperture to become great shots of the Milky Way, which is why I listed the maximum discontinuity as i of the specs I like about this lens, however, I really cruel in dearest with shooting at f/ane.8 when I tested out the 20mm lens a few months back. So again, if the user is someone only shooting nightscapes and astrophotography I recollect f/2.8 is a bit of a limitation on this lens, only if they are trying to apply it for multiple roles I retrieve it’s worth the compromise.


As mentioned multiple times, in that location are alternative lenses I think i should look into before deciding on this lens solely for astrophotography and nightscapes. If budget is a big deciding cistron and someone just wants to go out and attempt Milky Manner photography, I call back the Rokinon Z mount 14mm f/2.8 is a peachy starter lens. The Rokinon lenses (Samyang depending on your location) are known for having more vignetting and blackout than other more expensive lenses. At a toll bespeak often under $400 when on sale, the Rokinon option makes for an impressive starter lens.

Nightscape photo taken with an F mountain Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 lens.

The other lens I would highly recommend taking a look at is the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.viii S. Considering of the f/ane.8 max aperture, this lens is a workhorse for astrophotography due to the extra light that can brand its way to the camera’s sensor when compared to f/ii.8. Although it doesn’t accept the range of focal lengths similar the 14-24mm, I call up 20mm is still a great focal length to shoot at for nightscapes and can brand for some more intimate photos with the Galaxy. Finally, the 20mm lens comes at a much lower price bespeak around the $k marker. That’south well under 50% of the price of the xiv-24mm for a lens that has just as great eyes and an improved maximum aperture.

A photo of the milky way stretching in a higher place hoodoos in the big bend region of texas shot with a Nikon Z6 using a Nikon Z mount 20mm f/1.eight South lens.

Summing information technology all upwardly, I think the Nikon Z fourteen-24mm f/2.8 S lens is a spectacular lens for astrophotography and nightscapes. At the finish of the mean solar day, it will e’er come down to a personal option based on budget and lens preferences. However, the 14-24mm is fantastic for those who can afford it and need a versatile lens for multiple photography genres.

About the writer:
After a few trips with his married woman, Will Chaney realized he was just being a tourist taking photos of everything he could. In 2022, he started studying more about paradigm composition and different photography techniques to get him to where he is today. Will is still learning and does not see that portion of photography ever ending for him. This review was originally posted here.


Posted by: