Nikon Z7 Ii Vs Canon R5

By | 01/11/2022

In this commodity, allow’due south compare two of Nikon’s high-resolution cameras: the Nikon Z7 Two and Nikon D850. Although the two cameras look very unlike on the surface – the Z7 Ii beingness a lightweight mirrorless camera, the D850 being a tank-similar DSLR – they’re both intended for similar audiences. Thanks to features like a 45 megapixel sensor, base ISO 64, and congenital-in focus stacking, the Z7 2 and D850 are aimed at mural photographers and others who need maximum levels of item.

Of the two, the Nikon Z7 Ii is substantially newer, existence released at the end of 2020 (compared to mid-2017 for the D850). But the D850 was so far ahead of the contest when it first came out that it notwithstanding holds up well today.

As y’all can run across from the image below, the Nikon Z7 Two looks positively puny compared to the D850:


Just that’s par for the course with a mirrorless photographic camera, and it doesn’t reverberate anything negative about the Nikon Z7 II. In fact, many photographers consider the Z7 2’s small-scale size and light weight a good thing, since information technology makes it easier to carry along while traveling or hiking.

So, let’southward dive below the surface and see how each photographic camera compares in do. We’ll start past looking at their specifications.

Specifications Comparison

Camera Feature Nikon Z7 Ii Nikon D850
Announced October fourteen, 2020 July 25, 2017
Sensor Resolution 45.7 MP 45.7 MP
Sensor Size 35.9 × 23.9mm 35.nine × 23.9mm
Mount Nikon Z Nikon F
Low-Pass Filter No No
Sensor Pixel Size 4.35µ four.35µ
Image Size 8,256 × 5,504 eight,256 × five,504
In-Body Image Stabilization Yes No
Image Processor Dual EXPEED 6 EXPEED 5
Buffer: RAW xiv-scrap Lossless Compressed 49 51
Buffer: RAW 12-fleck Lossless Compressed 77 200
Native ISO Sensitivity ISO 64-25,600 ISO 64-25,600
Additional ISO Sensitivity ISO 32, ISO 51,200-102,400 ISO 32, ISO 51,200-102,400
Dust Reduction / Sensor Cleaning Yeah Yes
Viewfinder Type Electronic Viewfinder / EVF Pentaprism / OVF
Viewfinder Coverage and Magnification 100%, 0.8x 100%, 0.75x
Built-in Flash No No
Storage Media one× CFe / XQD + ane× SD UHS II 1× CFe / XQD + 1× SD UHS II
Continuous Shooting Speed 10 FPS (12-flake RAW), 9 FPS (14-bit RAW) 7.0 FPS, 9.0 FPS with MB-D18
Fastest Shutter Speed 1/8000 sec 1/8000 sec
Longest Shutter Speed 900 sec 30 sec
Flash Sync Speed i/200 i/250
Exposure Metering Sensor TTL exposure metering using main image sensor 181,000-pixel RGB sensor
Autofocus System Hybrid PDAF; 493 AF points Phase detect; 153 AF points, 99 cross-type
AF Detection Range -ii to +19 EV (-4 to +19 EV with depression-calorie-free AF) -four to +20 EV
Heart-Tracking AF Yeah No
Focus Peaking Yes Yes
Video Maximum Resolution 4K up to 60 FPS, 1080p up to 120 FPS 4K up to 30 FPS, 1080p upward to 120 FPS
HDMI Output 4:ii:2 ten-Bit 4:2:2 viii-Chip
Log Recording N-Log No
Sound Recording Built-in stereo microphone
External stereo microphone (optional)
Congenital-in stereo microphone
External stereo microphone (optional)
Headphone Jack Yes Yeah
LCD Size and Type 3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD three.ii″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD
LCD Resolution 2,100,000 dots 2,359,000 dots
Built-in GPS No No
Wi-Fi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Battery Life, Stills 360 shots (CIPA); 420 shots (rear LCD only); 440 shots (rear LCD merely, energy saver on) 1840 shots (CIPA)
Bombardment Life, Movies 105 minutes (rear LCD); 100 minutes (EVF) 70 minutes
Button Illumination No Aye
Weather Sealed Body Yes Yes
USB Version 3.1 (Type C) 3.0 (Type A)
Weight (with Battery and Bill of fare) 705 grand (one.55 lbs) 1005 k (2.22 lbs)
Dimensions 134 × 101 × 70 mm (5.three × 4.0 × 2.8 inches) 146.0 × 124.0 × 78.5mm (five.7 × iv.9 × 3.1″)
Price Upon Introduction $3000 $3300
Price Today $3000 (cheque price) $3000 (check price)

While both of these cameras share a 45 megapixel BSI sensor with base ISO 64, they differ in a number of of import ways. The Z7 II usually comes out ahead in those differences: better video specs, higher FPS shooting, lighter weight, IBIS, and then on. The Nikon D850 is clearly ahead in battery life and has a couple minor features that the Z7 II lacks (such as illuminated buttons and a 1/250 second flash sync speed) simply otherwise falls a flake behind.

Much of this is reflected in the prices. Whereas the Nikon Z7 II is a new photographic camera and has notwithstanding to proceed sale, the D850’s price has steadily lowered over the past few years. Although it retails for $3000 just like the Nikon Z7 Ii, I’ve seen it go on sale for $2500, and even less if you’re willing to buy refurbished or used.

I should also point out that specifications alone don’t always tell the total story. For example, looking at the specs, the Nikon D850 has a ameliorate buffer than the Z7 II when shooting 12-bit RAW: 200 rather than 77 images. Just that specification is for the Z7 II at 10 FPS, with the D850 at 7 FPS. When both are set to a comparable frame rate, their buffer is substantially equal.

Something similar is true of these cameras’ autofocus systems. The Nikon D850 may seem to exist worse because it “but” has 153 autofocus points, compared to the Z7 II’southward 493 AF points. Simply in practice, the D850 is improve than the Z7 Two at tracking fast-moving activity across the frame, and thus amend for something like photographing birds in flight. By comparison, the Z7 Two is better than the D850 in unmarried-servo autofocus mode, focusing much more quickly in live view (at least when using native lenses) and having a bit more accurateness likewise. These aren’t things that are reflected in the specifications, but rather the result of our extensive tests of these ii cameras. (Run into our Nikon Z7 II review and Nikon D850 review for more.)

Then at that place are some factors where the two cameras differ, just information technology’s not necessarily clear which i has the reward. The biggest such case is the lens mount: Nikon Z mount for the Z7 Ii, and Nikon F mount for the D850. The benefit of the Z mount is that it can take Nikon’s extraordinary Z-serial lenses, as well equally whatsoever F-mount lens if using the (somewhat finicky) FTZ adapter. The benefit of the F mount is that it has a much wider range of lenses than the Z mount, and no adapter is needed in order to use them. You tin can read more in our article on Nikon Z vs Nikon F.

A final departure worth pointing out is simply the type of viewfinder. Some photographers prefer electronic viewfinders (EVFs) due to the ability to zoom in and review photos without taking your camera abroad from your eye. Others prefer the through-the-lens appearance of an optical viewfinder (OVF). This is completely dependent upon the photographer, and while the Nikon Z7 II has i of the most natural-looking EVFs that I have ever used, some photographers will never want an EVF in the first place.

Now let’southward take a look at some high ISO tests between the Z7 Ii and the D850.

Low Low-cal Performance

For the images below, I have fabricated 100% crops of the same scene from both the Nikon Z7 Ii (on the left) and D850 (on the correct). The goal is to mensurate their low-lite operation. You can click on the images to see them larger.

At low ISO values, in that location is no visible difference between these 2 cameras, so let’s get-go with ISO 800:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 800
Nikon D850 ISO 800

Even there, I see no differences, and then here’southward ISO 1600:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 1600
Nikon D850 ISO 1600

In the ISO 1600 images above, I encounter just a hint more color noise on the Z7 2. This becomes more than evident when ISO is pushed to 3200:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 3200
Nikon D850 ISO 3200

And even more than so at ISO 6400:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 6400
Nikon D850 ISO 6400

At ISO 12,800, both cameras produce plenty of noise, but the D850 is still alee:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 12800
Nikon D850 ISO 12800

ISO 25,600 continues this trend:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 25600
Nikon D850 ISO 25600

At extremely high ISOs similar 51,200, both cameras are unusable, fifty-fifty though the D850 retains its slight advantage:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 51200
Nikon D850 ISO 51200

Lastly, ISO 102400 looks awful. The D850 looks slightly less awful of the two, but these photos are both going in the trash:

Nikon Z7 II ISO 102400
Nikon D850 ISO 102400

At the end of the twenty-four hours, the differences here are going to be almost insignificant in one case the appropriate level of noise reduction is applied in mail-processing. It’s a benefit of mayhap 1/three of a stop in the D850’s favor, and perchance not even that. Suffice to say, image quality should not exist a factor in your determination to become either the Z7 II or D850.


If y’all’ve narrowed it down to these two cameras, but yous’re not sure which one is better for you, here’s what I would recommend.

First, if budget is an issue, just get with the D850 (and ideally buy it used or refurbished). For the money you lot’ll save over the Z7 Two, you tin upgrade your lens or tripod and get some meaningful image quality improvements.

On the other hand, if yous shoot a lot of video, option the Z7 Two. It can shoot deadening-motion 4K video, outputs college-quality footage over HDMI, and has plenty of other helpful features like in-body image stabilization and an EVF. I would also strongly recommend the Z7 Ii if you’re planning to travel a lot or hike with this camera, since information technology weighs substantially less.

The D850’due south biggest reward over the Z7 II is autofocus tracking on fast-moving subjects, similar birds in flight. The Nikon Z7 Ii actually does a great chore of tracking subjects that have obvious eyes (such as cats, dogs, and people), but it falls short when tracking more full general subjects. For photographers who want to do extensive wildlife photography alongside their mural work, the D850 is probably the way to go.

That said, ignoring price, the Z7 Ii is still the better camera overall for most photographers. Information technology’south smaller, lighter, and more feature-rich. Even for wild fauna photography, it’s not a bad option, cheers to the big buffer and an excellent maximum frame rate of x FPS. The D850 is 1 of the best cameras of all time, but the Nikon Z7 II is more than 3 years newer, and information technology shows. The Z7 II also has access to the full line of Z-series lenses (too as all the F-mount drinking glass via the FTZ adapter), while the D850 does not.

You tin’t become wrong either mode, of form. These are ii of the best cameras on the market, especially for mural photography. Since many of their differences come downwards to the standard mirrorless vs DSLR differences, saying which one is “best” is a fool’s errand, since it depends on your own needs and preferences. When yous find a adept deal on one of them, go for it, and don’t look back.

I hope you lot institute that useful, and if you lot desire to see more than comparisons between these two cameras with others on the market, yous may discover these links helpful:

  • Nikon Z7 II vs Nikon Z6 II
  • Nikon Z7 2 vs Nikon Z7
  • Nikon Z7 2 vs Canon EOS R5 vs Panasonic S1R vs Sony A7R Iv
  • Nikon D850 vs Nikon Z7
  • Nikon D850 vs Nikon D780
  • Nikon D850 vs Nikon D810 vs Nikon D800
  • Nikon D850 vs Catechism 5D Marker Iv

You can as well read our full review of each of these cameras here:

  • Nikon Z7 II Review
  • Nikon D850 Review
Nikon Z7 II Image Samples #31
NIKON Z7 II + NIKKOR Z 20mm f/i.8 S @ 20mm, ISO 64, 1.3 seconds, f/5.half-dozen
Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art Image Sample (16)
NIKON D850 + 14mm f/i.8 @ 14mm, ISO 64, thirty seconds, f/8.0
Nikon Z7 II Image Samples #36
NIKON Z vii 2 + AF-South NIKKOR 500mm f/v.6E PF ED VR @ 500mm, ISO 90, ane/1000, f/5.6
Nikon D850 Image Samples (4)
NIKON D850 + 58mm f/1.4 @ 58mm, ISO 64, 1/400, f/2.0