Sigma 16 35mm Lens For Canon

By | 26/10/2022

Canon 16-35 f4L vs Sigma xiv-24 f2.8 Art

Canon 16-35 f4L vs Sigma 14-24 f2.8 Art


2

Hello all,

Long fourth dimension reader kickoff fourth dimension poster. I am torn between the Canon sixteen-35 f4L and the new Sigma 14-24 f2.eight Art. This would be for mural and travel. I shoot with a Catechism 5D Marker iii. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

ANSWER:

This question has not been answered yet.

Re: Catechism 16-35 f4L vs Sigma fourteen-24 f2.eight Art


3

16-35 is more flexible. Think about information technology, exercise yous really demand that broad? It’due south rare to have ultra wide photos on travel and landscape. sixteen is too broad already. Only those shot inner close stuffs will capeesh this wide range.



Catechism EOS 7D Mark 2



Catechism EOS R5



Canon EF 85mm F1.2L Two USM



Catechism EF 200mm f/2.8L Two USM



Catechism EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM

+11 more

hotdog321

hotdog321 •

Forum Pro

• Posts: 21,127

Re: Canon 16-35 f4L vs Sigma 14-24 f2.8 Art


7

1NoobPhotographer wrote:

Hello all,

Long fourth dimension reader offset time poster. I am torn between the Canon 16-35 f4L and the new Sigma 14-24 f2.eight Art. This would be for landscape and travel. I shoot with a Catechism 5D Mark three. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

I was one of the first to purchase the xvi-35 f/4L IS and still dearest the heck out of information technology. The IS role is solid and useful, and it is pretty precipitous at the edges and corners even broad open. Virtually landscape photographers love this lens.

The Sigma sure looks interesting, just practise you actually demand f/two.8 or to shoot out to 14mm at the cost of the useful 24mm-35mm range? If yous programme to shoot stars and aurora it might exist but the ticket. Otherwise I would requite the nod to 16-35.



Canon EOS 5D Mark IV



Canon EF 100mm f/two.eight Macro USM



Catechism EF seventy-200mm F2.8L IS Ii USM



Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM



Canon EF sixteen-35mm F4L IS USM

+iii more than

HeyItsJoel

HeyItsJoel •

Senior Member

• Posts: i,206

Re: Canon 16-35 f4L vs Sigma 14-24 f2.8 Fine art


2

Some other vote for Canon.  I’one thousand biased though because I don’t like third political party lenses.

— hide signature —

I’chiliad a little left-brained and a niggling right-brained.

sceneIt •

Contributing Member

• Posts: 616

Re: Canon 16-35 f4L vs Sigma 14-24 f2.8 Art


1

1NoobPhotographer wrote:

Hi all,

Long time reader first time poster. I am torn betwixt the Canon 16-35 f4L and the new Sigma 14-24 f2.8 Art. This would exist for landscape and travel. I shoot with a Canon 5D Mark iii. What are your thoughts? Thanks!

I have the Sigma 12-24mm f4. It’s cool how wide 12mm is and I personally retrieve it makes for awesome landscapes. I honey how it makes everything look actress vast. As a portrait lens information technology’s fun as well. Y’all can really play with people’south dimensions… non that you lot couldn’t with the Canon xvi-35.

The biggest event with either of the Sigma UW zooms is that they’re heavy. According to the specs the Canon is most half the weight.

The Canon also has a standard filter mountain, the Sigma’due south do not. With the Sigma you’re looking at a pricey customized filter mount and big expensive filters to go in it.

Both lenses are tiptop class.



Canon 6D Mark II



Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II USM



Sigma 85mm F1.4 Fine art



Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art



Tamron SP 70-200 F2.8 G2

+one more

Ken60 •

Senior Member

• Posts: 3,187

Re: Canon xvi-35 f4L vs Sigma 14-24 f2.eight Art


2

I have the sixteen-35 Canon and have shot and played with the Sigma fourteen -24 ART.

BOTH are swell in their own style.  IS is lovely to have , just retrieve it will simply aid y’all in beingness still , NOT you scene or people.  F2.8 will allow another stop on the shutter.

If yous ever intend to shoot Milky way or that sort of astro stuff so f2.eight is the way to go.

As others mentioned the f4 Canon is standard 77mm filter thread, and so your polariser from the 100-400 IS ll , or the 24 – 105 etc will fit. … filters for the 14 – 24 ain’t going to happen . I could almost come across a instance for both

— hibernate signature —

Gear … what I need to get the job done , later on all you don’t run into mechanics listing their make of spanner equally a qualification .